Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US midterm elections: Undercover investigation exposes 'easy' electoral fraud in North Carolina

An imposter was given 20 ballot papers while posing as different voters

Lizzie Dearden
Tuesday 04 November 2014 11:44 GMT
Comments
Residents stand in like to take part in the last day of early voting in Raleigh, North Carolina
Residents stand in like to take part in the last day of early voting in Raleigh, North Carolina (EPA)

An American activist has exposed the apparent ease of electoral fraud in North Carolina by being given 20 votes while posing as a different person each time.

James O’Keefe, president of the Project Veritas Action group, said he used the online electoral roll to look for “inactive voters” who were unlikely to vote in the midterm elections after years without casting a ballot.

He and his team narrowed down the list to 30-year-old men he could pose as, then memorised their publicly listed names and addresses and visited polling stations taking early votes across North Carolina.

It is one of 19 US states where no identification is required to vote. Other areas have varying laws, requiring documents but no photos, for example, or allowing only a strict list of photo ID.

Hidden cameras showed Mr O’Keefe approach electoral officials and ask if they had his chosen name on the list, posing as them if they confirmed it with the memorised details.

In one case, an official did not even require him to state his assumed name and address but fed him the details.

The man stated Mr O’Keefe’s fake identity, giving him a ballot paper after he confirmed “yes” to each line.

“So I just sign this and then I’ll be able vote afterwards?” Mr O’Keefe asked.

He was given a ballot paper 20 times but did not commit fraud by signing them or voting.

To make the ruse harder for himself, Mr O’Keefe asked some centres if he needed to show ID or offered to get it from his car.

“You know what I completely forgot my driver’s license,” he said on one occasion.

One of the election officers who gave the imposter a ballot paper (Project Veritas Action/YouTube)

“You don’t need it,” an official replied, insisting that she was “positive” when Mr O’Keefe asked if she was sure.

The video only showed his sting failing on one occasion, when officials broke state rules to request identification because the man he was posing as had not voted in years.

“Of all of the undercover investigations I’ve conducted, this was by far the easiest,” said Mr O’Keefe. “They were willing to pass out fraudulently obtained ballots like it was Halloween candy.”

The makers of the film said the stunt proved that “the opportunity for fraud on a massive scale is way too easy” in states that require no ID, because of the millions of inactive voters.

North Carolina is changing its own laws (the Voter Information Verification Act) from the beginning of 2016, requiring voters to show photo identification when they arrive to vote in person.

Flyers informing voters of the new voter ID law in Charlotte, North Carolina (Reuters)

“Until 2016, most voters will not be required to show any form of identification when they vote,” a statement on the state government website said.

There have also been calls for identification to be a requirement for elections in Britain, where it is currently only needed in Northern Ireland.

A report by the Electoral Commission earlier this year called for voters to need to show photo ID by no later than the 2019 European and local government elections to minimise the risk of fraud.

All seats in the House of Representatives and 33 of 100 seats in the US Senate were up for election in the midterm elections closing today, along with positions state governors and other officials.

Barack Obama’s Democrats claimed they had the edge in North Carolina but the overall outcome is expected to be a shift to the right with gains for the Republicans.

The conservative party only needs six seats for a Senate majority and 13 more in the House of Representatives would give it the largest share there since 1946.

North Carolina’s State Board of Elections has not yet replied to The Independent’s request for a comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in