Barack Obama 'rolled his eyes' at Donald Trump's wiretapping accusations

Former President's representatives deny he ordered alleged surveillance at Trump Tower

It was unclear whether Mr Trump has spoken directly to his predecessor on the issue
It was unclear whether Mr Trump has spoken directly to his predecessor on the issue

Barack Obama reportedly “rolled his eyes” at Donald Trump’s allegations over alleged wiretapping during the US election.

His representatives have denied that the former President made any kind of surveillance order on Trump Tower, leaving such powers to the Justice Department.

A source close to Mr Obama told NBC News he felt the claims “undermine the integrity of the office of the President” but do not undermine his own integrity, because “he didn't do it”.

Former director of national intelligence denies there was a 'wiretap' at Trump Tower

“[Mr Obama] is much more concerned by President Trump kicking people off their health insurance, not staffing the government, not being prepared for a crisis, rolling back regulations so that corporations can pollute the air and water and letting mentally unstable people buy guns with no problems whatsoever,” the source was quoted as saying.

“He cares about all those things much more than what President Trump tweets at the TV each morning.”

Mr Trump made the allegations in a stream of tweets early on Saturday morning, where he accused the former administration of Cold War-era McCarthyism.

“Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my “wires tapped” in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found,” he wrote.

“How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy! [sic]”

No evidence was immediately produced to support the allegations, which Mr Trump has now asked the House and Senate intelligence committees to investigate.

Sean Spicer, the White House spokesman, admitted that the President had not spoken to the FBI director over the claims but that “there’s no question that something happened”.

When asked why Mr Trump wanted Congress to investigate if he already had solid evidence of wiretapping in October, Mr Spicer said it was a “question of appropriateness”.

Mr Obama's representatives said neither he nor any other White House official had ordered surveillance on a US citizen and his director of national intelligence, James Clapper, said nothing matching Mr Trump's claims had taken place.

Following the tweets, FBI Director James Comey privately asked the Justice Department to dispute the President's claim because he believed the allegations to be false.

Donald Trump addresses a joint session of Congress on 28 February (Getty Images)

The leaders of the congressional inquiry into Russia's alleged efforts to sway the US election have called on the Justice Department to produce any evidence on the issue.

Declaring that Congress “must get to the bottom” of Mr Trump’s claim, senators Lindsey Graham and Sheldon Whitehouse asked the Acting Deputy Attorney General and Mr Comey to produce the paper trail created when the Justice Department's criminal division secures warrants for wiretaps.

The most senior Republican and Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary crime and terrorism subcommittee said they would take very seriously "any abuse of wiretapping authorities for political reasons".

A statement added: “We would be equally alarmed to learn that a court found enough evidence of criminal activity or contact with a foreign power to legally authorise a wiretap of President Trump, the Trump Campaign, or Trump Tower."

The senators are seeking warrant applications and court orders, which they said can be scrubbed to protect secret intelligence sources and methods.

Under US law, a federal court would have to had found probable cause that the target of the surveillance is an “agent of a foreign power” in order to approve a Fisa warrant authorising electronic surveillance.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in