Trump tax returns: California passes measure to ban president from ballot without financial disclosures

'Disclosure required by this bill will shed light on conflicts of interest, self-dealing, or influence from domestic and foreign business interests', governor says

Clark Mindock
New York
Tuesday 30 July 2019 22:30
California passes law to ban president from ballot without financial disclosures

California has passed an unprecedented requirement that Donald Trump release his tax returns, or else find himself ineligible for inclusion on the state’s primary ballot next year.

The law was signed on Tuesday by governor Gavin Newsom, and requires all presidential candidates to submit five years of income tax filings in order to be eligible for the primary ballot.

The bill was originally passed in the state legislature on a party line vote.

“As one of the largest economies in the world and home to one in nine Americans eligible to vote, California has a special responsibility to require this information of presidential and gubernatorial candidates,” Mr Newsom said in a statement.

He continued: “These are extraordinary times and states have a legal and moral duty to do everything in their power to ensure leaders seeking the highest offices meet minimal standards, and to restore public confidence. The disclosure required by this bill will shed light on conflicts of interest, self-dealing, or influence from domestic and foreign business interests.”

The bill marks the latest effort by Democrats across the country to force Mr Trump to release his tax returns, including an effort in the House of Representatives and in New York State.

Those efforts have been thwarted by Mr Trump, who broke from modern day campaigning tradition by refusing to offer up his tax returns while running for president in 2016.

Since then, questions have swirled about why the president would decline to hand over those documents, even as he has claimed he is held back from making the disclosures because of tax audits.

Among the concerns raised by Mr Trump’s political opponents are whether he or his companies have ongoing business relationships or loans from foreign entities, and whether Mr Trump might have conflicts-of-interest in his official work as president stemming from his private financial dealings.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

But, Republicans have cast the effort in California as an unconstitutional overreach by a party hell bent on making life miserable for Mr Trump.

“The Constitution is clear on the qualifications for someone to serve as president and states cannot add additional requirements on their own,” Tim Murtaugh, the communications director for Mr Trump’s re-election campaign, said in a statement provided to the Los Angeles Times.

Meanwhile, state Republicans have also attacked the measure, with state senate minority leader Shannon Grove saying earlier this month that to “continue to consistently be hostile, from this legislative body, to the president of the United States is just not something we should do. Quit poking the bear.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in