Senator Ed Markey asks Amazon if doorbell cameras are listening to our conversations

Ring cameras can capture audio up to 25 feet away, according to a new study

Graig Graziosi
Tuesday 21 June 2022 17:27
Comments

Related video: Senate fails to act over controversial surveillance laws

Don't move, your doorbell camera might hear you.

That dystopian sentence is the crux of Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey's latest gripe with Amazon. According to a recent letter of concern he forwarded, Mr Markey wants to know if Amazon's surveillance doorbell camera, Ring, is secretly listening in on our conversations.

The letter was prompted by a recent study conducted by Consumer Reports that found that once a Ring's motion detectors had been triggered, it could record conversation-level audio from up to 25 feet away.

That not only means that anyone within 25 feet of the doorbell — bikers, delivery drivers, pedestrians — could unknowingly have their conversations recorded by some random person's house, but that Amazon could be listening in on the homeowners or their neighbors.

If a family was having a conversation with a window open, or close to the door when its motion sensor activated, it could end up recording their conversations.

More troubling are individuals living in apartment buildings who use Ring cameras. In those cases, the cameras microphones are essentially aimed at their neighbors' doors.

"Since Ring has well over 10 million device users, it appears likely that Ring products record millions of Americans’ activity without their knowledge every day. This surveillance system threatens the public in ways that go far beyond abstract privacy invasion: individuals may use Ring devices’ audio recordings to facilitate blackmail, stalking, and other damaging practices," Mr Markey wrote in his letter. "As Ring products capture significant amounts of audio on private and public property adjacent to dwellings with Ring doorbells—including recordings of conversations that people reasonably expect to be private— the public’s right to assemble, move, and converse without being tracked is at risk."

The crux of Mr Markey's concerns is that law enforcement agencies will treat the doorbells as essentially a network of eyes from which they can spy on the public. He asked Amazon to never incorporate voice recognition software into the cameras and for the company to disclose how many private police agencies have access to its Ring software.

The senator went further, demanding that Amazon refuse to take financial contributions from police, refuse to donate to the police, and to permanently ban immigration enforcement agencies — like ICE — from requesting access to the camera footage.

It's not the first time the doorbell cameras have faced scrutiny. Last year, a UK judge ruled that Ring cameras' audio recording capabilities violated the Data Protection Act after a neighbor used several cameras to monitor a communal parking lot.

Ring sits solidly at the top of the US market for doorbell cameras, no doubt in part due to its Amazon branding.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in