Trump administration to bring back death penalty for federal crimes

The US government has put three people to death since 1988, with most recent execution occurring in 2003

Clark Mindock
New York
Thursday 25 July 2019 11:34
Donald Trump calls for the death penalty to be brought back for killing police officers in 2017 speech

The United States will resume capital punishment for the first time in nearly two decades, after attorney general William Barr directed the Federal Bureau of Prisons to schedule the executions of five death-row inmates.

Mr Barr announced in a statement that the death penalty would be reimplemented in order to bring justice to the families of victims, and that the five death-row inmates have all been convicted of murder. In some cases, the individuals have also been convicted of the torture or rape of children and the elderly.

“Congress has expressly authorised the death penalty through legislation adopted by the people’s representatives in both houses of Congress and signed by the president,” Mr Barr said in the statement.

The statement continues: “Under administrations of both parties, the Department of Justice has sought the death penalty against the worst criminals, including these five murderers, each of whom was convicted by a jury of his peers after a full and fair proceeding. The Justice Department upholds the rule of law – and we owe it to the victims and their families to carry forward the sentence imposed by our justice system.”

Among the five who have been identified is a white supremacist who killed a family of three; a man who dismembered a 16-year-old girl before killing an 80-year-old with a claw hammer; and a man who shot and killed five people.

The Justice Department says that all five people have exhausted their appellate and post-conviction remedies.

The vast majority of death penalties carried out in the United States are conducted at the state level, and not at the federal level, in spite of this recent decision.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Across the US, there are 29 states that have authorised the punishment, while a growing number of states have acted to abolish the measure.

Among the states that still have capital punishment are California, Texas, Arizona, Florida, and Oregon. New York, Alaska, Washington, Illinois, and others have acted to abolish the death penalty.

At the federal level, the death penalty was held unconstitutional in 1972, but reinstated in 1988 for a narrow set of offences. The Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994 opened up the number of offences to about 60.

Just three federal executions have been carried out in the modern era, however, with the most recent occurring in 2003 with the killing of Louis Jones Jr, following the Texas rape and murder of Army soldier Tracie Joy McBride. Timothy McVeigh, the man responsible for the 1995 Oklahoma City bombings, was put to death by the US government in 2001.

Georgia death row inmate becomes 1,500th person to be executed since US brought back death penalty

While states have begun banning the practice – often citing the incredible costs of the procedures leading up to the event and the potential for error – American sentiment has remained largely the same on the issue.

According to historical polling data from Gallup, the majority of Americans have approved of the punishment since at least the mid-Sixties, the last time that the polling service showed more opposition than support.

The most recent polling on the issue found that 56 per cent of Americans support the death penalty for individuals convicted of murder, compared to 41 per cent who do not support the punishment.

In response to the Department of Justice’s announcement on Thursday, critics of the death penalty quickly cast the decision as “arbitrary” and “racially-based”, and one susceptible to “junk science”.

“The pervasive myth is that the federal death penalty is the ‘gold standard’ of capital punishment systems, applied only to the worst offenders for a narrow class of especially heinous crimes involving unique federal interests, with highly skilled and well-resourced lawyers on both sides,” wrote Ruth Friedman, the director of the Federal Capital Habeas Project, in a statement. “This is false.”

Ms Friedman continued: “In fact, the federal death penalty is arbitrary, racially-biased, and rife with poor lawyering and junk science. Problems unique to the federal death penalty include over-federalisation of traditionally state crimes and restricted judicial review. These and other concerns, including troubling questions about the new execution protocol, are why there must be additional court review before the federal government can proceed with any execution.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in