Judge blocks federal health care worker vaccine mandate in 10 states

The Biden administration’s rule requiring health care workers to receive Covid-19 vaccines is blocked in Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming

Andrew Feinberg
Washington, DC
Monday 29 November 2021 21:56
Moderna could have omicron vaccine by early 2022

A federal judge in St Louis, Missouri has issued an injunction barring the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services from enforcing a requirement that health care workers at facilities which receive federal funds in Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming be vaccinated against Covid-19.

The order, which was issued on Monday by District Judge Matthew Schlep, only applies to those states because they are currently suing the Biden administration to block implementation of the CMS rule, which administration officials say is necessary to prevent Covid-19 from spreading rampant in health care facilities.

The lawsuit in question was filed on 10 November by Missouri attorney general Eric Schmitt, who was joined by elected Republican attorneys general from the nine other plaintiff states. The GOP attorneys argued that the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate amounted to “dragooning of our States’ healthcare heroes” that usurped state government’s power to regulate vaccination of citizens.

Although the Covid-19 vaccines were developed during former president Donald Trump’s term, antipathy towards any effort to require that Americans be vaccinated against Covid-19 has become de rigeur among Republicans as a way to demonstrate their opposition to Mr Biden and his administration.

The Department of Justice, which represents CMS and the other federal defendants in the case, has argued that federal laws and regulations giving CMS authority to preempt state policies give CMS the authority to lay out standards that override any state prohibitions against vaccine mandates. Such authority, the government said, is necessary to help slow the spread of Covid-19.

But in his opinion approving a preliminary injunction against the mandate, Judge Schlep — a Trump appointee — wrote that the policy “seeks to overtake an area of traditional state authority by imposing an unprecedented demand to federally dictate the private medical decisions of millions of Americans”.

“Such action challenges traditional notions of federalism,” he added. “Congress did not clearly authorize CMS to enact the this politically and economically vast, federalism-altering, and boundary-pushing mandate”.

The Independent has contacted the White House for comment.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in