Trump aide Kellyanne Conway to be blocked from testifying to Congress by White House

Lawyers reject testimony request as Conway accuses Democrats of trying to 'silence' her

John Wagner,Rachael Bade,Josh Dawsey
Tuesday 25 June 2019 14:41
Comments
Kellyanne Conway is accused of violating the Hatch Act by attacking Democratic candidates while speaking in her official role
Kellyanne Conway is accused of violating the Hatch Act by attacking Democratic candidates while speaking in her official role

The White House will block Kellyanne Conway from testifying before a House panel about allegations that she violated the Hatch Act, which bars federal employees from engaging in political activity while on the job.

White House lawyers on Monday rejected the House Committee on Oversight and Reform’s request for Ms Conway, a prominent Trump aide, to appear at a hearing on Wednesday, increasing the likelihood of another subpoena battle between the two branches of government.

In a letter addressed to the committee chairman Elijah Cummings, counsel to the president Pat Cipollone wrote that “in accordance with longstanding precedent, we respectfully decline the invitation to make Ms Conway available for testimony before the committee.”

House Democrats counter, however, that the White House has no right to claim executive privilege or immunity for Ms Conway because the alleged violations deal with her personal actions – not her duties advising the president or working in the West Wing.

A report submitted to Donald Trump earlier this month by the Office of Special Counsel – which a Trump appointee runs – found that Ms Conway violated the Hatch Act on numerous occasions by “disparaging Democratic presidential candidates while speaking in her official capacity during television interviews and on social media”.

It recommended Mr Trump terminate her federal employment.

The panel plans to vote on Wednesday to subpoena Ms Conway if she does not agree voluntarily to answer questions.

Meanwhile, Ms Conway has appeared on national television to defend her name. On Monday morning, she said on Fox News that House Democrats are trying to retaliate against her for managing Mr Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

“You know what they’re mad about?” Ms Conway said. “They want to put a big roll of masking tape over my mouth because I helped as a campaign manager for the successful part of the campaign ... So they want to chill free speech because they don’t know how to beat (Trump) at the ballot box.”

Special counsel Henry Kerner, a longtime congressional GOP staff member, said in an interview that her description is not true.

“We’re trying to hold Ms Conway to the same standard we hold other people in government to,” Mr Kerner said on Monday. “My staff came up with violations. They’re obvious. She says things that are campaign messages.”

The Office of Special Counsel is a quasijudicial independent agency that adjudicates claims of retaliation by whistleblowers and administers the Hatch Act and other civil service rules. It is separate from the office run by former special counsel Robert Mueller, who led the inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Because Ms Conway is a presidential appointee, the Office of Special Counsel has no authority to discipline her. It can make recommendations, but it falls to Mr Trump to make a decision. He has indicated that he has no plans to fire her.

In its 17-page report, the office found Ms Conway repeatedly attacked 2020 Democratic presidential candidates in interviews with media outlets in her official capacity, and tweeted about the candidates from her official account.

The agency noted Ms Conway said former vice president Joe Biden had a lack of “vision,” and that senator Elizabeth Warren spent “decades appropriating somebody else’s heritage and ethnicity,” and called senator Cory Booker “sexist” and a “tinny” motivational speaker.

During a one-week period leading up to the 2018 midterm elections, Ms Conway posted at least 15 messages on Twitter that were political and in support of candidates or the Republican Party, according to the report. “Her defiant attitude is inimical to the law, and her continued pattern of misconduct is unacceptable,” the agency wrote.

House Democrats argue Ms Conway’s alleged infractions are emblematic of the administration’s behaviour and a prime example for their oversight.

Ms Conway was warned to change her behaviour but has not, and lawmakers think they can hold her up as an example to argue the administration thinks it is above the law.

The hearing on Wednesday will feature the agency’s recommendation to remove Ms Conway, as well as its reports about other Trump administration appointees. Ms Conway and Mr Kerner were invited to attend.

In her TV appearance on Monday, Ms Conway said it was not clear that she is subject to the Hatch Act and that the situation is being misconstrued.

“We think I’d be the first member of the West Wing to ever be hauled in front of congress to talk about the Hatch Act,” Ms Conway said.

“The Hatch Act means that you can’t advocate for or against the election of – of an individual,” she continued. “And if I’m talking about the failures of Obama-Biden care, if I’m talking about the fact that 28 million Americans have no health insurance, that’s a fact. If I’m quoting what some of the candidates say about the other candidates, I’m just repeating the news to you as I read it that day.”

© Washington Post

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in