Lindsey Graham says if Republicans controlled the Senate, Jackson would not have had a hearing

Senator’s words come ahead of a deadlocked vote for confirmation of Biden nominee for country’s highest court

Eric Garcia
Monday 04 April 2022 20:40
Comments
Lindsey Graham questions Ketanji Brown Jackson about Brett Kavanaugh hearings
Leer en Español

Republicans defended their questioning of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson during her confirmation hearing on Thursday

South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said on Monday that if Republicans controlled the Senate, she would not have received a hearing.

Mr Graham made the remarks during the Senate Judiciary Committee’s confirmation vote for Judge Jackson weeks after her confirmation hearing. The South Carolina Republican noted how this would be the first time that he would vote against a Supreme Court nominee, having voted to confirm Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, both of whom Barack Obama appointed.

“If we get back the Senate and we’re in charge of this body and there’s judicial openings, we will talk to our colleagues on the other side, but if we were in charge she would not be before the committee,” Mr Graham said during the confirmation vote hearing. “You would have had someone more moderate than this.”

Mr Graham had previously lobbied for President Joe Biden to nominate J Michelle Childs of South Carolina and criticised Democrats for their treatment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Multiple other Republican Senators criticised Ms Jackson, including Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, who hit out at her record.

“I believe she will prove to be the most extreme and furthest left justice ever to serve on the United States Supreme Court,” he said.

Senator Josh Hawley, who asked some of the most aggressive questions about her sentencing for child sex abuse images, attacked allegations he was engaging in conspiracy theories.

“Sex crimes against children are not fiction,” he said. “They are not a conspiracy.”

The White House had previously called his questioning a “QAnon-signaling smear.”

In response, Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey asked his Republican colleagues why they voted for Republican-appointed nominees who had made similar sentences on child sex abuse cases.

“Why didn’t you vote against every one of those Republican judges that was not following the guidelines, as most don’t?” he said. “I’ve heard things that are just ridiculous.”

The Judiciary Committee adjourned Monday afternoon because of the fact that Democratic Senator Alex Padilla of California, who is on the committee, had troubles with his flight to Washington, delaying his arrival. The committee took a brief recess to allow for him to return.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in