Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Mo Brooks appears to tweet his email password while complaining about Democrat serving him in riot lawsuit

While accusing Eric Swalwell’s legal team of ‘unlawfully sneaking’ into home, Alabama congressman appears to share his own Gmail password and PIN

Alex Woodward
New York
Monday 07 June 2021 15:05 BST
Pence admits he and Trump will never see eye to eye on ‘dark day’ of the Capitol riot

Republican US Rep Mo Brooks appeared to post a photo of a Gmail password and PIN to his Twitter account while raging against US Rep Eric Swalwell, who has sued the Alabama congressman for provoking a riot at the Capitol on 6 January.

The GOP lawmaker said a process server “finally” served him in the lawsuit on Sunday, after Mr Swalwell’s legal team argued that Mr Brooks and his staff had avoided being served for weeks.

In a post on Twitter from an iPad directed at Mr Swalwell, Mr Brooks claimed that “HORRIBLE Swalwell’s team committed a CRIME by unlawfully sneaking INTO MY HOUSE & accosting my wife” to serve him in the suit. He attached a photo of a computer screen with Alabama’s criminal trespassing law, with a sticker below the screen that appears to include a PIN and Gmail password.

As of Monday morning, the post remained online.

Roughly two hours after his first post, he posted the same message again, this time adding a “.” before Mr Swalwell’s Twitter handle, so that the post appears on the timelines of users who don’t follow both men.

Mr Brooks serves on the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology.

Twitter users also pointed out the irony that he accused a process server of “unlawfully” entering his home to serve him in a lawsuit over the failed insurrection in Congress in which hundreds of people in a pro-Trump breached the halls of Congress.

An attorney for Mr Swalwell said the allegation is “utterly false” and that the process server “lawfully handed the papers to Mo Brooks’ wife at their home … which is perfectly legitimate under the federal rules,” according to Forbes.

Mr Brooks also claimed that “experts” will download home security video on Monday, and an “arrest warrant to be sought”.

In court filings this week, attorneys for Mr Swalwell alleged that Mr Brooks “refused to waive service or even speak to undersigned counsel about the case” for weeks, prompting the team to hire a private investigator to find him where he could legally be served.

An investigator “spent many hours over many days in April and May at locations in multiple jurisdictions attempting to locate and serve Brooks, to no avail,” attorneys said.

Mr Swalwell’s 65-page complaint filed in US District Court in Washington DC also targets Donald Trump, Donald Trump Jr and Rudy Giuliani, whose speeches to a crowd before a mob swarmed the US Capitol on 6 January were seen as a months-long culmination of an election conspiracy narrative that incited a deadly riot.

“Today is the day American patriots start taking down names and kicking ass,” Mr Brooks said in his remarks.

He asked the crowd to consider Americans who sacrificed “sometimes their lives” to create the “greatest nation in world history”.

“Are you willing to do the same?” he said.

Mr Swalwell was not legally permitted to serve Mr Brooks on the House floor, and the sergeant at arms would have to give permission to a process server to enter.

Attorneys for Mr Swalwell also said security issues make serving Mr Brooks inside the halls of Congress difficult, and that his staff and attorneys for Mr Brooks did not make themselves available.

“It is not a defendant’s job to alter his conduct and go out of his way to seek out suit service,” Mr Brooks said a statement to The Independent shared by his office following last week’s filing. “I have altered my conduct not one iota since Swalwell’s politically motivated, meritless lawsuit was filed. I have made dozens of publicized public appearances since the lawsuit was filed. If Swalwell was sincere about suit service, he could have served me at any of these public events.”

He also claimed that Mr Swalwell could have served him “at any time during, before or after” floor votes, though federal rules prohibit him from doing so.

Attorneys for Mr Trump have sought to dismiss the case, arguing that he has “absolute immunity” from responsibility because he was president at the time of the assault.

The lawsuit filed by Mr Swalwell is one of two cases from Democratic lawmakers against Mr Trump and his allies for the attack.

separate lawsuit from US Rep Bennie Thompson and 10 other House Democrats has accused Mr Trump, Mr Giuliani and members of the Proud Boys and far-right militia groups of a “concerted campaign to misinform their supporters and the public, encouraging and promoting intimidation and violence in furtherance of their common plan to promote” Mr Trump’s re-election, despite his definitive loss.

The defendants have asked a US District Court judge to dismiss the suit.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in