Funding for untested rape kits and DNA evidence stalls in congress

There is vast backlog of untested evidence across country

Tom Jackman
Sunday 08 September 2019 16:27 BST
Comments
Debbie Smith, whose journey through the criminal justice system led to the Debbie Smith Act funding testing of backlogged DNA kits, pleads for its continuation
Debbie Smith, whose journey through the criminal justice system led to the Debbie Smith Act funding testing of backlogged DNA kits, pleads for its continuation (Tom Jackman/ The Washington Post)

Support truly
independent journalism

Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.

Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.

Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.

Louise Thomas

Louise Thomas

Editor

Debbie Smith was ready to tell her story again, if necessary.

Rape victim. DNA evidence untested for years. Evidence finally tested. Suspect identified and convicted.

Her story helped inspire the federal Debbie Smith Act, first passed in 2004, to provide funding for testing and training to eliminate the vast backlog of untested DNA and rape kit evidence across the country.

Over the next 15 years, nearly 200,000 DNA matches have been made by a national database after samples were submitted because of the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program.

But now that funding is set to expire. So Ms Smith stood on a podium in Washington on Friday morning and pleaded with congress to reauthorise the funding before the law expires on 30 September.

“Most victims went through that gruelling evidence collection process,” Ms Smith said of the DNA collection that happens after a sex crime, “with the hope that it would help them. Please, I’m begging congress to allow them to live in that hope.”

The Senate unanimously reauthorised the Debbie Smith Act in May and sent it to the house. It has not moved.

The leaders of the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network (RAINN) said on Friday they had gathered 32,000 signatures from online petitions that they were presenting to house leadership in hopes it would push Senate Bill 820 towards passage.

Scott Berkowitz, RAINN president and founder, said: “some in the house are using it [the Debbie Smith Act] as leverage to get the Senate to pass other things that have nothing to do with DNA testing. We need Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader [Steny] Hoyer to step up.”

Mr Hoyer’s staff said that the house had reauthorised the Debbie Smith funding as part of its vote in April to reauthorise the Violence Against Women Act, meaning that the funding has passed both houses of congress but in different bills.

“We are discussing next steps with the [House] Judiciary Committee,” said Mariel Saez, a spokeswoman for Mr Hoyer, who said he ”continues to urge” Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell ”to take up the VAWA reauthorisation passed by the house in April, which includes the Debbie Smith Act reauthorisation”.

A McConnell spokesman said the majority leader was not leading the Senate’s handling of VAWA.

The Smith act was reauthorised with broad bipartisan support in 2008 and 2014. The current bill authorises the US Justice Department to spend up to $151m (£123m) in grants to states and localities for costs associated with testing DNA evidence, to include employee training and equipment for labs to increase their testing capacity.

The problem of DNA going untested for months or years is not a new one. Sometimes, evidence is taken from a victim or a crime scene and then left on a shelf in a police department. Sometimes the local or state crime lab is so backed up that it takes months just to get the evidence analysed.

Once a DNA profile is developed, it is submitted to CODIS, the national DNA databank, which already has about 17 million profiles, in hopes of finding a match.

The DNA can also help exonerate wrongly accused defendants, experts noted.

According to the FBI, that system has produced more than 475,000 matches, solving crimes across the spectrum from murder to rape to burglary to vandalism.

Of those 475,000 hits, the National Institute of Justice found, about 42 per cent came as a direct result of the Debbie Smith Act, or about 200,000 cases which might otherwise have gone unsolved.

One in five rape kits entered into the national DNA databank generates a match pointing to a serial rapist, RAINN said.

And even with $1bn (£810m) in federal spending since 2004 to address the backlog, the problem is getting worse.

A recent study by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that the number of untested cases has grown by 85 per cent in the past six years.

This is largely because the number of samples submitted for DNA testing nationwide went from about 242,000 in 2011 to 308,000 in 2017. That caused the number of samples awaiting testing to grow from 91,000 in 2011 to about 169,000 in 2017, the GAO found.

And that is just the backlog in the labs. Mr Berkowitz said another 200,000 rape and DNA kits are estimated to still be held by law enforcement agencies, which is ”a problem which is a lot bigger than we knew at the beginning”.

He said some states are requiring police to audit their evidence rooms for untested kits.

Independent Minds Events: get involved in the news agenda

“To think there is a 200,000 sexual assault backlog is unconscionable,” said congresswoman Ann Wagner, who has sponsored a number of bills aimed at sex crimes and trafficking. “This is one of the most important things we should be doing in congress.

“This is a no-brainer. Shame on congress for not bringing this forward sooner.”

At the news conference, Ms Smith did not retell her story of being raped in Virginia in 1989, and the evidence not being tested until 1994, when a match was made and a man convicted.

But she did reveal through tears that she had left her mother’s deathbed in Ohio to travel to Washington to push congress forward.

“For many, the Debbie Smith Act is their only hope for justice,” she said. “Hope deferred is a slippery slope into the abyss of hope shattered for the victims who live in turmoil. Hope deferred means another day, week or year that a rapist remains on the street ... This program changes lives.”

The Washington Post

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in