Robert Mueller requests 35 blank subpoenas against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort

Former lobbyist accused of laundering, tax evasion and fraud

Mr Manafort pictured arriving at a federal court house in March
Mr Manafort pictured arriving at a federal court house in March

Special counsel Robert Mueller has petitioned a judge for 35 blank subpoenas as a part of its case against Donald Trump's former presidential campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

Mr Mueller, who is leading the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, made the request last week.

In theory, it could mean that federal prosecutors are planning on bringing in as many as 35 witnesses to testify against Mr Manafort.

“It is respectfully requested that the Clerk of said Court issue subpoenas as indicated below for appearance before said Court at Alexandria Virginia, in the United States District Court at 10:00 o’clock am, on 10th day of July, 2018, then and there to testify on behalf of the United States,” the request, filed on April 6 in a federal district court in Virginia, says.

Mr Manafort, who has pleaded not guilty to accusations for crimes including money laundering, tax evasion and fraud, has been deemed "substantial a flight risk" by US District Judge Thomas Selby Elliss III, who will hear the case.

In an order last month, the judge noted that Mr Manafort’s has the “financial means and international connections to flee and remain at large”.

In a court order, Judge Selby wrote: “Specifically given the nature of the charges against the defendant and the apparent weight of the evidence against him, defendant faces the very real possibility of spending the rest of his life in prison."

Mr Manafort was charged last October and then indicted with further crimes in February. They stem from Mr Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, although it is not clear that the current charges filed against Mr Manafort directly relate to his time working on President Donald Trump’s election campaign.

Mr Manafort is a well-known political operative with deep connections to Republicans in the United States, and has spent a considerable portion of his career working as a political consultant in Ukraine.

In response to his charges, Mr Manafort’s lawyers have argued that, since they do not relate specifically to the 2016 election, they should be dropped.

“The conduct alleged here was not discovered because of the special counsel’s investigation into alleged coordination; nor was it ‘demonstrably related to’ that investigation,” a filing on behalf of Mr Manafort, which cites several alleged tax violations that would have occurred before Mr Trump even declared his candidacy, reads.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in