Trump transition team 'red flagged' senior US general because he was opposed to torture
Leaked documents reveal potential problems among nearly 100 administration candidates
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Trump transition team passed over a senior US general who was being considered for the president’s administration because he was opposed to torture, leaked documents have revealed.
The vetting documents, obtained by Axios on HBO, highlight potential issues among nearly 100 candidates who were considered in late 2016 and early 2017 for top positions in Donald Trump’s administration.
Among them was General David Petraeus, former director of the CIA, whose vetting form, under the title “Red Flags”, highlighted his publicly stated opposition to torture.
“Petraeus Is Opposed To Torture,” it said, with a link to a 2016 Slate article by Fred Kaplan titled The Rehabilitation of David Patraeus.
Just days into his presidency, Mr Trump declared his support for torture in an interview with ABC in which he said “torture works” and he would “absolutely” bring back banned interrogation methods such as waterboarding.
He later nominated for the position of CIA director Gina Haspel, who had previously led a controversial interrogation programme, which included instances of waterboarding and other techniques some experts consider torture.
Gen Petraeus, who was reportedly considered for the positions of secretary of state and national security adviser, was also red flagged for his concerns over “inflammatory political discourse” against Muslims, and his support for a bill restricting gun access to people on an FBI watch list.
Other notable red flags against potential officials included comments before the election by Mick Mulvaney – now the White House chief-of-staff – that Mr Trump would in a “perfect world” be disqualified from becoming president, and the multiple “foreign entanglements” involving Rudy Giuliani, Mr Trump’s personal lawyer.
Axios reported the Trump transition team foisted the vetting process onto the Republican National Committee, which used a team of two-dozen researchers made up almost entirely of twenty-somethings to conduct the research.
"We'd be sitting around and Trump would be like, 'Oh, hey, I'm bringing like Joe Shmoe up to Bedminster for Department of Interior,' and then we were like, 'F***, we need to run a vet on this guy to make sure he's not a kid-toucher’," one figure involved in the vetting process told the news outlet.
"It was just a clown show."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments