Democrats introducing bill to guarantee independent investigation into Trump's Russia ties

Ms Feinstein says 'It was clear the FBI was taking its job seriously' when Mr Trump fired FBI Director Comey 

Senator Dianne Feinstein
Senator Dianne Feinstein

Senate Democrats plan to introduce legislation “to ensure that a truly independent prosecutor can be appointed” to investigate alleged ties between Moscow and associates of President Donald Trump, Senator Dianne Feinstein has said, in the wake of Mr Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey.

The bill, which Ms Feinstein is working on with Senator Richard Blumenthal, could resemble an “independent counsel” statute that Congress passed in response to the Watergate scandal. That statute required a panel of three federal judges to appoint an independent counsel when there was credible evidence that a president or high-level executive official may have violated the law. Congress let the independent counsel law expire in 1999.

“It was clear the FBI was taking its job seriously, and a substantial investigation was underway,” Ms Feinstein said, and the timing of Mr Comey's dismissal “could implicate” the Trump administration.

Mr Blumenthal told the Atlantic that the legislation calls for special counsel appointed by a three-judge panel.

“However, while we work on that legislation, I want to renew my call to have a special prosecutor appointed to oversee the Russia investigation,” Ms Feinstein said.

Other top Democrats are also asking Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to appoint a special prosecutor, despite White House spokesman Sean Spicer telling reporters “there is clearly at this point no evidence of a reason” for one, as “you have a system that's working”. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has also opposed the idea.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions cannot appoint a special prosecutor because he recused himself from the Russia investigation after he failed to disclose meetings that he had with the Russian ambassador to the US, Sergei Kislyak.

In announcing the president’s decision to fire Mr Comey, the White House said the president acted based on the recommendations of both Mr Rosenstein and Mr Sessions.

Mr Rosenstein had written in a memo to Mr Sessions that he could not defend the FBI Director’s “refusal to accept the nearly universal judgment that he was mistaken” in his handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation.

On the Senate floor, Democratic leader Charles Schumer said “there is little reason to think that Mr Rosenstein’s letter is the true reason that President Trump fired director Comey.”

“Why?” Mr Schumer added. “Because if the administration truly had objections to the way Director Comey handled the Clinton investigation, they would have had them the minute the president got into office. But he didn’t fire Director Comey then. The question is: Why did it happen last night?”

Mr Schumer pointed out that Mr Rosenstein said during his Senate confirmation hearing in March that he would be willing to appoint a special prosecutor at the appropriate time.

“If there was ever a time when circumstances warranted a special prosecutor, it is right now,” Mr Schumer said.

He added: “If Mr Rosenstein is true to his word, that he believes this investigation must be 'fair, free, thorough and politically independent,' if he believes as I do that the American people must be able to have faith in the impartiality in this investigation, he must appoint a special prosecutor and get his investigation out of the hands of the FBI and far away from the heavy hand of this administration.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in