Sign up for the daily Inside Washington email for exclusive US coverage and analysis sent to your inbox
Get our free Inside Washington email
Donald Trump is discussing with his advisers the possibility of sitting out the general election debates in 2020 because of his misgivings about the commission that oversees them, according to two people familiar with the discussions.
They claimed the US president has told advisers that he does not trust the Commission on Presidential Debates, the nonprofit entity that sponsors the debates.
Less of a concern for Mr Trump than who will emerge as the Democratic nominee is which media personality will be chosen as the debate moderator, according to people in contact with him.
At a state-of-the-race campaign briefing in Virginia, the president’s advisers declined to comment on what their plan was for the debates.
One senior adviser to the president seemed to wince at the question and said it was not something they were prepared to discuss until next year.
Donald Trump celebrity president: A decade in two halves
Show all 29
In the 2016 general election debates, Mr Trump repeatedly complained about being at a disadvantage to Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee. And the post-debate polls showed he had good reason to be concerned: Mr Trump and Ms Clinton were essentially tied in the polls going into the first debate, but she received a bump after each of the three face-to-face matchups.
A Gallup poll conducted after the third debate, for instance, found that 60 per of viewers thought Ms Clinton did a better job, while 31 per cent chose the current president.
He wanted them seated in his VIP box, where Bill Clinton would have to walk past them; they would also have been in Ms Clinton’s line of site from the stage.
In the end, the campaign had to stand down after the commission threatened to call security and have the women removed.
Former Clinton aides said they expected Mr Trump to participate in at least one 2020 debate, despite the president’s hints that he would refuse.
“Not doing any would not be strategically smart,” said Philippe Reines, a longtime Clinton adviser, who predicted that “he’ll bluff that he won’t do any with the goal of only having to do one”.
The New York Times
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies