Supreme Court must release Trump financial records, urge prosecutors

Lawyers seek release of eight years' worth of presidential business and personal tax returns

In a pair of filings Thursday, a House committee and Manhattan prosecutors urged the Supreme Court to clear the way for disclosure of Donald Trump’s financial records.

The filings concerned subpoenas in separate cases to Mr Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA. Federal appeals courts have refused to block the subpoenas, and the firm has indicated that it will provide the records unless the Supreme Court orders it to withhold them.

In one Supreme Court brief, the House Oversight and Reform Committee opposed an emergency application from Mr Trump to block a subpoena seeking his financial records while the court decides whether to hear his appeal.

Mr Trump’s application, filed last week, sought a stay of a ruling in October by a divided panel of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejecting the president’s argument that the subpoena was improper because the committee had no valid legislative purpose for seeking the information.

Responding to Mr Trump’s request, lawyers for the committee said its enquiries were driven by its legislative and oversight responsibilities.

On Monday, chief justice John Roberts issued a temporary stay to give the court time to consider Mr Trump’s application for a longer one. Should the Supreme Court deny the application in the case, Trump vs Mazars USA, the accounting firm would be required to provide the records.

The second Supreme Court filing Thursday concerned a subpoena from the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus Vance, a Democrat, for eight years of Mr Trump’s personal and business tax returns.

The subpoena sought information concerning the reimbursements made to the president’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, for payments to pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels, who said she had an affair with Mr Trump.

A unanimous three-judge panel of the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals, in Manhattan, ruled this month against Mr Trump. The court, in Trump vs Vance, said state prosecutors may require third parties to turn over a sitting president’s financial records for use in a grand jury investigation.

Mr Trump’s lawyers, in a petition seeking review of the decision, said he is immune from criminal investigation while he remains in office.

Mr Vance said the appeals court’s ruling was narrow and “plainly correct.”

The New York Times

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in