House Freedom Caucus announces support for new Republican healthcare bill to replace Obamacare

It remains to be seen if the new plan will be supported by enough moderate Republicans to be passed

The House Freedom Caucus announced that they support a revised bill to replace Obamacare
The House Freedom Caucus announced that they support a revised bill to replace Obamacare

The House Freedom Caucus has announced it supports the new Republican health care reform bill that aims to replace Obamacare.

The news marks a potentially bright contrast from the dramatic collapse in healthcare negotiations that occurred last month and appeared to put President Donald Trump's promise to repeal and replace Obamacare — which is officially named the Affordable Care Act — in jeopardy. Mr Trump had vowed to revisit the healthcare negotiations following that collapse but observers have noted that cobbling together a healthcare repeal plan that pleases both the hard line conservatives in the Freedom Caucus and more moderate Republicans would be difficult.

The Freedom Caucus released a statement Wednesday noting that its members would support proposed changes to the plan if it included the so-call MacArthur amendment that would allow states to opt out of some provisions in the Affordable Care Act in certain cases.

"The MacArthur amendment will grant states the ability to repeal cost driving aspects of Obamacare left in place under the original AHCA. While the revised version still does not fully repeal Obamacare, we are prepared to support it to keep our promise to the American people to lower healthcare costs," the Freedom Caucus said in a statement.

The revised bill would make several changes to attract members of the caucus, according to early reports. Those revised provisions include giving states the ability to opt out of some insurance regulations that are required in the Affordable Care Act by offering a federal waiver that would allow insurers to charge patients with preexisting conditions with higher premiums.

It remains to be seen if moderate Republicans will back the plan.

Mr Trump and Republicans, after making the repeal and replacement of Obamacare their primary legislative goal for years, failed to pass an alternative last month in part because House Freedom Caucus members refused to sign on to an alternative proposed by moderate Republicans in Congress that stopped short of completely dismantling the Affordable Care Act. Generally speaking, Freedom Caucus members believe that government involvement in healthcare — whether through regulation or subsidies — is the root cause of high healthcare prices and so the entire framework of Obamacare should be dismantled. Moderate Republicans feared that completely dismantling the healthcare law would lead to unmanageable numbers of people losing health insurance.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in