Mental illness rates among children of undocumented immigrants 'double when facing deportation'

Research comes as President weighs scrapping a scheme that allows 800,000 people to remain 

Andrew Buncombe
Minneapolis
Thursday 31 August 2017 18:57
Comments
Many Americans feel sympathy for the so-called 'dreamers'
Many Americans feel sympathy for the so-called 'dreamers'

Mental illnesses suffered by the children of undocumented immigrants to the US drops by half if those youngsters no longer face the threat of deportation, researchers have claimed.

As Donald Trump weighs scrapping a scheme introduced by his predecessor that has allowed hundreds of thousands of children and young adults without documents to remain in the country and study, researchers said they found that removing the stress of possible deportation had a major impact on mental health.

The Stanford Immigration Policy Lab, a research group that uses data to present policy options on immigration, sought to look at the impact of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) scheme, which was introduced in 2012 by Barack Obama. Currently up to 800,000 children and young people - the so-called “dreamers” - are permitted to remain under the scheme.

Donald Trump's immigration crackdown encapsulated in poignant footage of father being deported

They said an interdisciplinary team, including members from Stanford University, Oregon Health and Science University, the Stanford School of Medicine, and Northwestern University, looked at the intergenerational impact of the threat of deportation by examining the children of mothers who themselves were born either side of the cut off date to be eligible for DACA - June 15 1981.

The report, published in Science, a publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, said among the 8,610 children born to these mothers between 2003 and 2015, researchers looked for a range of mental illnesses known to be provoked by external stress, including adjustment disorder, acute stress disorder, and anxiety disorder.

Many Americans feel sympathy for the so-called 'dreamers'

The researchers wanted to see how the lives of children were impacted when their parents no longer feared being deported, the report said.

They found that before DACA was introduced, the two groups of children were diagnosed with disorders at roughly the same rate. However, after DACA was introduced “a gulf opened” between the two groups on either side of the mothers’s eligibility birth date cutoff: among those whose mothers were eligible, the rate dropped by more than half, from 7.8 per cent to 3.3 per cent.

“Our results imply that expanding deferred action, or providing more permanent protection, to the millions of unauthorised immigrant parents who do not meet the current DACA eligibility criteria could equally promote the well-being of their children,” said Duncan Lawrence, executive director of the Stanford Immigration Policy Lab.

“This would have important implications for this next generation of American citizens.”

Mr Lawrence, who told The Independent his team wanted to focus on the “downstream” impacts on mental health, said they had been working on the report for months.

Yet it comes as Mr Trump, under pressure from members of his administration and the Republican Party, is considering scrapping the DACA scheme.

During the election campaign, Mr Trump repeatedly said he would scrap it immediately. Since entering the White House he has admitted to struggling with the issue, especially since many Americans feel sympathetically towards the “dreamers”.

“It’s a decision that I make and it's a decision that’s very, very hard to make. I really understand the situation now,” he told reporters on Air Force One last month. “I understand the situation very well. What I’d like to do is a comprehensive immigration plan. But our country and political forces are not ready yet.”

CNN said this week that sources within the government believed Mr Trump would ultimately decide to scrap the scheme.

Mr Lawrence said his team had been working on the report for months. Yet he said he was pleased that it was being published now. He said: “It’s fortunate that this evidence is available.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in