Trump continues post-impeachment purge, targeting top Pentagon finance officer

Democratic Senator Jack Reed: McCusker is 'another casualty of the Trump administration's efforts to purge public servants'

Trump suggests using flu vaccine on coronavirus

Donald Trump, continuing his post-impeachment purge, has withdrawn the nomination of a career government bean-counter to oversee the Pentagon's finances.

The White House on Monday evening announced it was pulling back Elaine McCusker's nomination to be the Defense Department's permanent comptroller. She has been the Pentagon's acting chief financial officer since last summer, one among a slew scattered in once-powerful posts across the Trump administration.

Unearthed during the impeachment saga were emails that showed Ms McCusker raising concerns to White House budget officials about whether a presidential order to freeze a nearly $400m military aid package to Ukraine was legal.

Because she is time-limited in her role as acting comptroller, her nixed nomination means she essentially has an expiration date and is being pushed out of the Defense Department.

That adds her to the ranks of Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a former National Security Council Ukraine aide; Gordon Sondland, the former US ambassador to the European Union; Joseph Maguire, pushed out recently from his acting director of national intelligence post; and others who have been fired or reassigned since Mr Trump was acquitted by Senate Republicans earlier this year.

In remarkable comments, Mr Trump's acting chief of staff on Friday confirmed the purge will continue.

Mick Mulvaney, a former conservative congressman from South Carolina who shares Mr Trump's politics-first approach, said addressing the "deep state" would be a second-term priority, if the president wins in November.

"You want bureaucrats who work just as hard for Donald Trump as they did for Barack Obama," Mr Mulvaney said at the Conservative Political Action Conference. "That's only fair. ... And that does not happen.

Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, said in a statement that Ms McCusker is "paying the price for trying to ensure that the administration followed the law," calling her "another casualty of the Trump administration's efforts to purge public servants who put country before fealty to the president."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in