Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Game over!' Trump likely to be acquitted as impeachment trial draws to a close

'That's the plan,' McConnell ally says of Friday vote to clear Trump on both impeachment articles

John T. Bennett
Washington
Thursday 30 January 2020 15:11 GMT
Comments
Schiff slams Trump's lawyer's 'most dangerous' claim of not allowing witnesses at impeachment trial

After all that, it all could be over sometime on Friday.

Donald Trump appears to be on a metaphorical bullet train to acquittal on charges of abusing the power of the presidency and unjustly stonewalling Congress. And one of his once most unlikely of allies, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, is the conductor.

The president appeared on Wednesday evening to sense the Senate could move by week's end to a final vote on the House's two articles of impeachment, tweeting simply: "GAME OVER!" Mr Trump's words were displayed over a video clip from last summer of John Bolton, his former national security adviser, echoing his then-boss about fighting corruption in Ukraine being in America's national interests.

Democrats want Mr Bolton to testify in the trial after details of his coming book leaked on Sunday, including a portion in which the former White House official wrote he heard Mr Trump directly link a massive military aid package to the new Ukraine government to it announcing investigations of top US Democrats, including former Vice President Joe Biden, a leading 2020 presidential candidate.

But there were growing signs on Wednesday evening that Mr McConnell, considered a masterful behind-the-scenes tactician, had swayed several wobbly members of his caucus to oppose joining Democrats in voting to subpoena Mr Bolton's testimony.

"I'm ready to vote on final judgement," Senator John Barrasso told reporters. The Wyoming Republican is a member of Mr McConnell's leadership team (read: his inner circle), and has become a barometer of what the top Senate Republican is thinking.

"Yes, that's the plan," Mr Barrasso replied when asked if Republican leaders intend to skip any votes on witnesses and go instead on Friday to final votes on the two House-passed articles of impeachment.

Notably, a source familiar with Mr McConnell's thinking did not deny that is the leader's intention when pressed by The Independent.

Senate Democrats used part of their questions for Mr Trump's legal team and House Democratic impeachment managers on Wednesday to make the case that a trial without witnesses is anything but. (The Trump defence team, however, argued that in the previous two presidential impeachment trials, the Senate heard only from witnesses the House had interviewed.)

Despite the seemingly orchestrated questions and answers between House Democratic impeachment managers and Senate Democrats, their leaders by day's end appeared to signal defeat is near.

"We've always known it will be an uphill fight on witnesses and documents because the president and Mitch McConnell put huge pressure on these folks," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on Wednesday, during a break in the questioning.

"Is it more likely than not?" the New York Democrat said of Bolton and other witnesses being called. "Probably no."

Schumer: 'Trump tried to blackmail Ukraine'

Senator Ted Cruz earlier this week summarised the thinking of many Republican lawmaker-jurists, calling votes on witnesses and acquittal collectively an "easy and straightforward vote".

"I don't think any additional witness testimony is necessary," the Texas Republican said, saying he does not believe House Democratic managers have "come close to proving their case". He added that many Republican senators believe the House prosecutors failed to prove their own case that Mr Trump's insistence on securing from Ukraine investigations of the Bidens was "phony" and "baseless" and a "scam" to help him win re-election.

By Thursday morning, Democrats were acknowledging that Mr Trump by Friday likely will become the third sitting American president ever to be impeached and then cleared by the upper chamber.

"We know he's not going to be removed from office. There aren't 67 votes ... to remove him," David Axelrod, a former senior adviser to former President Barack Obama told CNN. "It's not going to happen."

That means the president's legal team's contention that a sitting chief executive's actions - unless clearly criminal - always are in the country's interests soon could become precedent.

Representative Jason Crow, a House impeachment manager, said on Thursday that means the legal team will have successfully argued "that the president is above the law".

"Since day one of this process, they've been saying a sitting president can't be indicted, that a sitting president can't be investigated," he said. "And now they're saying there's no impeachment power. So that truly, if you follow all that logic, would make the president above the law."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in