Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump team looks to end $37B program designed to help minority business saying it violates the Constitution

Two Indiana-based companies, Mid-America Milling Company and Bagshaw Trucking Inc., sued the Department of Transportation in 2023 over the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program

Mike Bedigan
Wednesday 28 May 2025 22:10 BST
Comments
The Trump administration has joined with two white-owned construction companies looking to end a $37 billion program designed to help minority-owned businesses, saying it is ‘unconstitutional’
The Trump administration has joined with two white-owned construction companies looking to end a $37 billion program designed to help minority-owned businesses, saying it is ‘unconstitutional’ (REUTERS)

The Trump administration has joined with two white-owned construction companies looking to end a $37 billion program designed to help minority-owned businesses, saying it is “unconstitutional.”

The Indiana-based companies, Mid-America Milling Company and Bagshaw Trucking Inc., sued the Department of Transportation in 2023 over the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program, arguing that it should be permanently dismantled.

On Wednesday the Department of Justice filed a proposal for a settlement with the DOT to dismantle the program – which was first authorized by Congress in 1983, and serves roughly 49,000 businesses that have been deemed to be disadvantaged.

The program is funded by the federal government but administered by states, and allocates at least 10 percent of government funding for transportation infrastructure to such contracting firms.

On Wednesday the Department of Justice filed a proposal for a settlement with the Department of Transportation – led by Secretary Sean Duffy – to dismantle the DBE
On Wednesday the Department of Justice filed a proposal for a settlement with the Department of Transportation – led by Secretary Sean Duffy – to dismantle the DBE (Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.)

The original complaint described the DBE as “the largest, and perhaps oldest affirmative action program in U.S. history” and claimed that the program’s “goals” were in fact “discriminatory barriers” targeting nondesignated racial groups including white Americans.

“The word ‘disadvantaged’ is simply code for women and certain minorities,” the complaint stated, adding that: “Disfavored racial groups must compete with the preferred racial groups on an unequal footing.

“Because the DBE program violates the Constitution’s ‘promise of equal treatment,’ it must be permanently dismantled.”

Last January, under the Biden administration, the DOT hit back at the suit, saying that the plaintiffs had “notably” not identified any current transport construction contracts that had “race- or gender-based subcontracting goals due to the DOT DBE program.”

In the filing, the Trump administration said it had ‘re-evaluated its position’, in light of a 2023 Supreme Court ruling which blocked race-conscious college admissions
In the filing, the Trump administration said it had ‘re-evaluated its position’, in light of a 2023 Supreme Court ruling which blocked race-conscious college admissions (AP)

However, in a new filing on Wednesday, the administration said it had “re-evaluated its position,” in light of a 2023 Supreme Court ruling which blocked race-conscious college admissions.

“Defendants, upon review of the DBE program and their position in this litigation, have determined that the program’s use of race- and sex-based presumptions is unconstitutional,” the filing stated.

“Over the past five decades, the federal government imposed a policy of race discrimination in the roadbuilding industry,” Dan Lennington, deputy counsel at the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, the conservative nonprofit representing the plaintiffs, told The Washington Post.

“Thousands of workers and small businesses have been victimized, and hundreds of billions have been spent, distorting the market and inflating construction costs for the taxpayers. That ends now.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in