Trump official tells court detained children don't need beds, soap or toothbrushes

Judges express incredulity at attempt to overturn legal findings regarding mistreatment of juveniles

Tom Embury-Dennis
Saturday 22 June 2019 09:20
Comments
Trump official tells court detained children don't need beds, soap or toothbrushes

The Trump administration has argued in court it should be able to force detained migrant children to sleep on concrete floors and deprive them of soap and toothbrushes.

In a Court of Appeals hearing in San Francisco on Tuesday, the Justice Department challenged earlier legal findings that a landmark class action settlement protecting undocumented migrant children from mistreatment in detention facilities had been violated.

Those judgements found the Obama administration had breached a 1997 settlement in the case of Jenny Lisette Flores v Edwin Meese, which established among other things that detained children be provided with “safe and sanitary” conditions.

US district judge Dolly Gee ruled in 2017 that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) had breached the settlement by failing to provide some detainees with items such as soap, toothbrushes and towels, as well as adequate food and drinking water, according to Court House News.

She also said children were being deprived of bathroom access and adequate sleep, as well as living in sometimes near-freezing temperatures.

Tuesday’s appeal by the Justice Department was an attempt to reverse Judge Gee’s findings because they added new requirements not included in the 1997 settlement.

“You’re really going to stand up and tell us that being able to sleep isn’t a question of safe and sanitary conditions?'” US circuit judge Marsha Berzon asked the Justice Department’s Sarah Fabian on Tuesday.

Judge William Fletcher added: “Are you arguing seriously that you do not read the agreement as requiring you to do anything other than what I just described: cold all night long, lights on all night long, sleeping on concrete and you’ve got an aluminum foil blanket?

“I find that inconceivable that the government would say that that is safe and sanitary.”

Pressed by all three judges on whether she really thought inadequate bedding and failure to provide basic toiletries could constitute safe and sanitary conditions, Ms Fabian said: “I think there’s fair reason to find that those things may be part of safe and sanitary…”

“Not may be. Are a part, why did you say ‘may be’?” Judge Fletcher interrupted.

Tuesday saw no ruling of the appeal, and the judges failed to indicate when there would be one, though the Trump administration’s prospects of success appeared distant.

“Have you considered whether you might go back and consider whether you really want to continue this appeal?” Judge Berzon said, adding: “There doesn’t seem to be a whole lot left of it, considering that life has so moved on now.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in