Democrats file no confidence resolution against Trump, listing 88 reasons why he is unfit to serve as President

American politicians file lengthy list of Donald Trump's gaffes

Harry Cockburn
New York
Wednesday 19 July 2017 21:12
A former federal prosecutor seems certain that people go to jail in connection to the Russia investigation
A former federal prosecutor seems certain that people go to jail in connection to the Russia investigation

Frustrated Democrat politicians in the US House of Representatives have filed an official “no confidence” resolution against President Donald Trump, formally questioning his suitability to occupy the White House.

The resolution, brought by Rep. Steve Cohen has no chance of successfully passing through the Republican-led chamber, but it provides a comprehensive litany of all of the President’s controversial actions since taking office.

It lists 88 reasons why the Democrats behind the resolution believe Mr Trump is not suitable to hold the Presidency and ranges from citing the furore over crowd sizes at Mr Trump’s inauguration, to the way Mr Trump has handled the investigation into Russian interference in the election.

The list also questions many of Mr Trump’s business deals, his regular volleys against what he calls the “fake news” media, and his derogatory verbal attacks on women.

“It’s just a sad day for Americans that we’ve come to this point,” Mr Cohen said at a news conference on Wednesday.

Mr Trump is “a president that you wouldn’t want your children to look up to,” Mr Cohen said in Washington.

“The way he talks about women, the press, the language he uses, the use of Twitter — you don’t want him to be a role model,” Cohen said. “It’s injurious to our culture, and it’s injurious to … our foreign policy.”

The resolution then makes a list of demands and calls on Mr Trump to release his tax returns, to divest his private business assets, to “refrain from using Twitter inappropriately”, to “unequivocally acknowledge that Russia interfered in the 2016 United States Presidential election”, and to support the First Amendment (freedom of speech) by supporting the freedom of the press and refrain from calling reporting ‘‘fake news’’.

According to a report in The Hill, Mr Cohen conceded his resolution may have little impact on the President.

“Is it going to have an effect on him? Apparently, his family members don’t have an effect on him, his Republican friends don’t, his Cabinet members don’t.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in