Trump-Russia dossier 'funded by Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the DNC'

Report links the controversial document to Democrats

Jeremy B. White
San Francisco
Wednesday 25 October 2017 01:16 BST
Comments
A new report links Ms Clinton's presidential campaign to the explosive Steele dossier
A new report links Ms Clinton's presidential campaign to the explosive Steele dossier

Funding for a controversial dossier detailing Donald Trump’s alleged connections to Russia came from Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee, according to a new report.

The dossier, compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, made salacious claims that Mr Trump has denounced as false, politically motivated attacks. Investigators exploring potential links between Russia and Mr Trump’s campaign orbit have spent hours interviewing the co-founder of Fusion GPS, the firm that hired Mr Steele.

It has previously been reported that the research was funded by a wealthy Republican donor who opposed Mr Trump’s ascendancy. But according to The Washington Post, some funding also came from a Democratic Party establishment with deep ties to Ms Clinton, the Democratic nominee whom Mr Trump defeated for the presidency.

According to the Post, an attorney representing Ms Clinton’s campaign and the DNC hired Fusion GPS after the Republican donor stopped funding the effort. Fusion GPS then shared its findings with the attorney, Marc Elias, the Post reported.

Previous reporting had found that Democrats funded the dossier in addition to the Republican donor. But in specifically citing the DNC, a key party institution, and Ms Clinton, still widely vilified by Mr Trump and his conservative base, the explosive report is likely to stoke the partisan flames raging around the investigations into Mr Trump’s circle.

The President has frequently rejected any allegation he or his campaign colluded with the Kremlin, and Mr Trump has specifically singled out the dossier as an example of what he calls a larger smear campaign.

As recently as this weekend, Mr Trump blasted the “discredited” document in a tweet and demanded that the federal government reveal who paid for it.

Allies of the President swiftly pointed to the Post’s reporting as evidence vindicating Mr Trump.

Evoking a common accusation against Mr Trump, conservative commentator Laura Ingraham referred to the story as a sign of “collusion”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in