Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump’s newest law firm target is where FBI foe Robert Mueller once worked

WilmerHale and Jenner & Bock have sued the Trump administration over the orders

Graig Graziosi
in Washington, DC
Friday 28 March 2025 21:01 GMT
Comments
Trump Executive Order Targets Law Firm, Citing Mueller Ties

Donald Trump is now looking to punish the WilmerHale law firm, which is the same company where Robert Mueller worked before he took on the role of special counsel to investigate the president's ties to Russia.

As he has done to other law firms that have acted against him, Trump's latest executive order kills all of the contracts WilmerHale held with the government and suspends the security clearances of its employees, according to the New York Times.

His order also prohibits WilmerHale employees from entering federal buildings, communicating with federal workers, and being hired at government agencies.

Other law firms Trump has targeted with executive order punishments — like Paul, Weiss, Wharton, Rifkind & Garrison — have opted to cut a deal with the president to do unpaid work for him to avoid the restrictions.

Trump's order makes clear that it was issued in part as a response to Mueller's investigation, which it calls "one of the most partisan investigations in American history."

Donald Trump has issued an executive order punishing WilmerHale, the law firm where Robert Mueller worked prior to his time serving as the special counsel investigating the president’s ties to Russia
Donald Trump has issued an executive order punishing WilmerHale, the law firm where Robert Mueller worked prior to his time serving as the special counsel investigating the president’s ties to Russia (Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved)

Muller resigned from his position at WilmerHale to lead the investigation after Trump's deputy attorney general appointed him as special counsel in the investigation. He retired from the law firm in 2021.

"WilmerHale rewarded Robert Mueller and his colleagues," the order says, and adds that "Mueller's investigation epitomizes the weaponization of government, yet WilmerHale claimed he 'embodies the highest value of our firm and profession.'"

In addition to taking issue with Mueller's history at the firm, Trump's order also complains about the firm's diversity efforts and its representation of clients who are suing the Trump administration over transgender rights and immigration issues, among others.

WilmerHale said in a statement that it planned to pursue "all appropriate remedies to this unlawful order."

On Friday, WilmerHale and Jenner & Bock — another law firm Trump targeted in his executive order with ties to Mueller — filed lawsuits opposing Trump's order.

They are the second and third law firms to sue Trump over his punishing executive order. Perkins Cole was the first, and its lawsuit resulted in a temporary block of Trump's order.

Lawyers representing Jenner & Bock argued in their lawsuit that Trump's order is unconstitutional and was meant to “chill” their work.

“These efforts to single out those who sue the government, to undermine the attorney-client relationship, to deter protected speech adverse to the Administration’s policy agenda, and to punish citizens for their associations are irreconcilable with the Constitution,” attorneys representing the firm said in its court filing.

WilmerHale's lawsuit alleges that Trump's order will "inevitably cause extensive, lasting damage to WilmerHale's current and future business prospects" and its ability to represent clients that want its services, according to the filing.

It also notes that Trump's order is solely a punishment for the firm's ties to Mueller.

“While most litigation requires discovery to unearth retaliatory motive, the Order makes no secret of its intent to punish WilmerHale for its past and current representations of clients before the Nation’s courts and for its perceived connection to the views that Mr. Mueller expressed as Special Counsel,” the filing said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in