'Two days rent in Trump Tower costs more': Trump's reported $750 tax bill inspires a rush of comparisons

Trump has denied the reports as “totally fake news”

Teo Armus
Monday 28 September 2020 17:22
Comments
Amongst the expenses listed by Twitter users was the Jonas Brothers 2019 tour and a RoboCop action figure
Amongst the expenses listed by Twitter users was the Jonas Brothers 2019 tour and a RoboCop action figure

The New York Times' bombshell report Sunday on nearly two decades' worth of President Donald Trump's tax returns included so many revelations about his finances that the newspaper listed them out separately.

There was the sum he paid in consulting fees to a company co-owned by his daughter Ivanka Trump, $747,622 (£581,060) or in haircuts as host of "The Apprentice", more than $70,000 (£54,400), both of which he wrote off as business expenses. There were losses reported by his golf courses, at least $315 million (£245) and his Washington hotel, more than $55 (£42.75) million.

But in the hours after the publication of The Times report, which Trump decried as "totally fake news," one much smaller figure drew the most attention: $750 (£582.9)

That was how much, according to The Times, Trump paid in annual federal income taxes during 2016, the year he ran for president, and 2017, his first year in office.

In 11 of the other 16 annual tax returns reviewed by The Times, he paid nothing, largely because his business empire reported losing more than it made. But it was the $750 (£582.9) tax payments – which would most closely match that of a minimum-wage worker, according to IRS data – that seemed even more insulting to many of the president's critics.

People came barreling onto Twitter to detail a long list of expenses that cost them more: antidepressants; crutches; a pair of sneakers; a month's rent in Lincoln, Neb.; two days' rent in Trump Tower; health insurance; lupus medication; tickets to the Jonas Brothers' 2019 tour; application fees for a US visa; insulin; a RoboCop action figure; poppers; a weave; a 2-terabyte hard drive; and organic juice from Erewhon Market, a luxury health food supermarket chain in Los Angeles.

Lawyer George Conway said he had spent more money purchasing food and treats for Skipper and Bonnie, the corgis he owns with wife, Kellyanne Conway, a former senior adviser to the president. Shanna Danielson, a former schoolteacher and Democratic state Senate candidate in Pennsylvania, said her out-of-pocket bill for classroom supplies came in higher.

Sam Ghali, an emergency medicine physician, wrote, "An ER visit costs more than $750 (£582.9)."

Hours after The Times report was published, so many people had chimed in to compare their returns to the president's that Joe Biden's campaign was selling buttons that read, "I paid more income taxes than Trump."

The former vice president's team also put out a 30-second video ad on Sunday evening comparing the $750 (£582.9) tax payment to the sums typically paid by three kinds of essential workers. Others noted that most undocumented immigrants, whom Trump has repeatedly bashed as a detriment to the economy, often pay more than he did.

"He contributed less to funding our communities than waitresses & undocumented immigrants," wrote Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who noted that she, too, had paid more in 2016 and 2017 while working as a bartender. "Donald Trump has never cared for our country more than he cares for himself. A walking scam."

Joseph Bankman, a Stanford Law School professor who studies tax law, told The Washington Post that a comparable tax payment would most commonly be found among Americans who make between $15,000 (£11,600) and $20,000 (£15,540) a year.

"We're talking about someone who works at a McDonald's, and not someone who is managing it," he said. "This is an hourly worker at a fast-food restaurant."

If the tax return is filed by a married couple, like Trump and his wife, Melania, Bankman said, a comparable income in the broader population moves up, but only slightly. Another couple in the United States paying that much in federal taxes would most likely be making between $20,000 (£15,540) to $25,000 (£19.430) together.

In other words, Bankman said, it might be analogous to two minimum-wage workers who are married to each other.

In 2016, about half a million tax returns were filed by couples who make that much, Bankman said. Needless to say, essentially all of them have a financial history eons away from Trump, a self-professed billionaire who was earning $200,000 (£155.440) a year in today's dollars from his father's business empire by the time he was three.

"$750 (£582.9) is an awfully low figure relative to Trump's consumption," Bankman said. "Trump has lived a pretty good life for someone that's paid that amount of taxes."

The Washington Post

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in