Carley Zeal, an OB/GYN in southern Wisconsin and fellow with Physicians for Reproductive Health, told The Washington Post that the unidentified woman was going through a miscarriage and needed to have the fetal tissue removed from her uterus.
However because of Wisconsin’s outright ban on abortion, the woman was turned away by emergency room staff at a hospital in the state.
Dr Zeal said that she saw the woman more than 10 days later when she was still bleeding severely and at serious risk of infection.
She treated the patient with medication to expel the fetal tissue from her uterus – the same medication used in many abortions.
“It really delayed her care,” Dr Zeal said. “I saw her a week and a half later with an ongoing miscarriage and bleeding, increasing the risk of severe bleeding as well as infections.”
The US Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v Wade ruling on 24 June, ending 50 years of federal abortion protection and sending power over access back to individual states.
In Wisconsin, almost all abortions were immediately banned because of an outdated law from 1849 which criminalises abortion care, making it punishable by up to six years in prison.
The only exception to the state’s abortion ban is when there is risk to the mother’s life.
Wisconsin’s Democratic Governor Tony Evers and Attorney General Josh Kaul have challenged the 1849 law arguing that its age means it should be unenforceable and that 1980s statutes supersede the ban.
However, in the meantime, abortion providers have been forced to stop providing care and doctors are clamouring to understand how to treat patients, including women suffering miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies and other complications.
Dr Zeal told The Washington Post that another physician had reached out to her for a second opinion on a patient who was suffering from a ruptured ectopic pregnancy.
“She knew exactly what she had to do because [the patient] was bleeding and was clearly going to die if nothing was done,” said Dr Zeal. “But she wasn’t sure what she needed to document to be sure she wouldn’t be charged with a felony.”
Confusion around whether doctors can treat patients without facing criminal prosecution has become a growing issue in several states.
Several reports have detailed delays in patient care as physicians have been forced to consult other doctors and lawyers for approval.
With abortion access fractured across the US, Democrats are trying to introduce sweeping federal protections.
On Friday, the US House of Representatives passed two bills: the Women’s Health Protection Act and the Ensuring Access to Abortion Act.
The Women’s Health Protection Act would codify the right to abortion care across America.
But, while the bill has passed the House, it is unlikely to clear the Senate with its 50-50 split of Republicans and Democrats.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies