China and Russia urge UN Security Council to lift North Korea sanctions

The draft proposal is a reworked resolution of one prepared by the two countries in 2019

<p>China and Russia are reportedly seeking to ‘enhance the livelihood’ of the civilian population in North Korea </p>

China and Russia are reportedly seeking to ‘enhance the livelihood’ of the civilian population in North Korea

China and Russia have urged the United Nations Security Council to lift sanctions on North Korea to “enhance the livelihood” of the civilian population.

The draft proposal seeks to ease sanctions by removing a ban on Pyongyang’s exports of statues, seafood and textiles. It also proposes that the ban on North Koreans working abroad must be removed and inter-Korean rail and road cooperation projects should be exempt from sanctions.

It seeks to acknowledge “the difficult situation of economy and livelihood of the DPRK [Democratic People’s Republic of Korea] in recent years, underscoring the necessity to respect the legitimate security concerns of the DPRK, and ensure the welfare, inherent dignity, and rights of people in the DPRK”, according to Reuters.

The draft proposal mirrors in many ways the resolution created by China and Russia for the 15-member Security Council in 2019. To pass a resolution in the Security Council, nine votes are needed. There should also be no vetoes from the United States, France, Britain, Russia or China to pass.

While two formal rounds of talks were held on the 2019 draft, the proposal was never formally put to vote, reportedly because of US disinterest. UN diplomats who wished to remain anonymous said that no new rounds of talks have been scheduled around the new draft proposal.

A spokesperson for the US mission in the UN said that the focus should be on ensuring that North Korea continues to comply with the existing sanctions.

“The Security Council has repeatedly affirmed that it is prepared to modify, suspend, or lift the measures as may be needed in light of the DPRK’s compliance. Yet the DPRK has taken no steps to comply with the Security Council’s demands regarding its prohibited nuclear and ballistic missile programs,” the spokesperson said.

However, a spokesperson for China’s mission to the UN had confirmed last month that the 2019 draft resolution “remains on the table.”

The UN has imposed sanctions on North Korea since 2006 citing its nuclear advancement programme. The particular industries that China and Russia have mentioned in their draft brought in millions of dollars to North Korea, before sanctions were put in place in 2016 and 2017.

North Korea is struggling with food insecurity, compounded by the fallout of border restrictions imposed during the pandemic.

Additional reporting by agencies

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in