China says US ‘addicted to quitting’ after Trump pulls out of WHO
Donald Trump has claimed that the WHO helped China cover up the Covid-19 outbreak in its early stages
The Independent employs over 100 journalists around the world to bring you news you can trust. Please consider a contribution or subscription.
A Chinese official has said the US is “addicted to quitting”, following Donald Trump’s decision to pull out of the World Health Organisation (WHO).
Zhao Lijian, China’s foreign ministry spokesman, accused Washington of playing power games after it withdrew from the WHO - despite calls from the international community for the US to remain in the organisation.
Mr Lijian told reporters during a daily briefing on Monday that the international community disagreed with what he said was the selfish behaviour of the United States.
As tensions between the two countries continue to build, Mr Lijian said US attempts to harm Chinese interests would be met with firm action, adding that Beijing would defend its security and development interests resolutely.
In recent weeks, Mr Trump has claimed that the WHO is a “puppet of China” and that the organisation helped Chinese officials cover up the outbreak of Covid-19.
On Friday, he announced that the US would revoke its membership of the health body, and has since threatened to deny it funding.
“The world is now suffering as a result of the malfeasance of the Chinese government,” said Trump when making the announcement. “Countless lives have been taken, and profound economic hardship has been inflicted all around the globe.”
The latest escalation in rhetoric comes after Trump announced that the US would end special trading arrangements with Hong Kong after China imposed controversial new national security laws on the territory.
The new laws make it an offence to “disrespect” the anthem of the People’s Republic of China in Hong Kong. The anthem must also be sung at schools and in organisations.
The legislation also includes provisions that prohibit “splittism, subversion, terrorism, any behaviour that gravely threatens national security and foreign interference”.
Critics have said the new laws pose a fundamental threat to personal freedoms in Hong Kong, while Trump described the move as a “tragedy”.
“China has replaced One Country, Two Systems with One Country, One System”, he told reporters in the White House’s Rose Garden, in a prepared statement that attacked China on several fronts.
“This is a tragedy for Hong Kong... China has smothered Hong Kong’s freedom.”
Comments
Share your thoughts and debate the big issues
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
-
Newest first
-
Oldest first
-
Most liked
{{/moreThanOne}}Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
-
Newest first
-
Oldest first
-
Most liked
{{/moreThanOne_p}}Follow comments
Vote
Report Comment
Subscribe to Independent Premium to debate the big issues
Want to discuss real-world problems, be involved in the most engaging discussions and hear from the journalists? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Already registered? Log inReport Comment
Delete Comment
About The Independent commenting
Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss real-world solutions, and more. Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles. You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies to your comment.
The existing Open Comments threads will continue to exist for those who do not subscribe to Independent Premium. Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate. Please continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates.