North Korea tells UN they will make US 'suffer the greatest pain'

'The Washington regime... [is] obsessed with the wild game of reversing the DPRK's development of nuclear force which has already reached the completion phase'

Samuel Osborne
Tuesday 12 September 2017 10:32
Comments
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un during a celebration for nuclear scientists and engineers who contributed to North Korea's hydrogen bomb test
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un during a celebration for nuclear scientists and engineers who contributed to North Korea's hydrogen bomb test

North Korea‘s envoy to the UN has warned “forthcoming measures” will “make the US suffer the greatest pain” it has ever experienced.

Pyongyang’s ambassador, Han Tae Song, made the vitriolic comments at the UN-sponsored Conference on Disarmament in Geneva.

The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) is “ready to use a form of ultimate means”, Mr Han said, without elaborating.

He said: “The Washington regime fired up for political, economic, and military confrontation, [is] obsessed with the wild game of reversing the DPRK’s development of nuclear force which has already reached the completion phase.”

Key moments in North Korea's nuclear programme

The Security Council unanimously approved new sanctions on North Korea, but not the toughest-ever measures sought by Donald Trump’s administration to ban all oil imports and freeze international assets of the government and its leader, Kim Jong-un.

“My hope is the regime will hear the message loud and clear and it will choose a different path,” US disarmament ambassador Robert Woods told the Geneva forum.

The resolution, adopted in response to Pyongyang’s sixth and strongest nuclear test explosion, bans North Korea from importing all natural gas liquids and condensates.

It also bans all textile exports and prohibits any country from authorising new work permits for North Korean workers – two key sources of hard currency for the northeast Asian nation.

As for energy, it caps Pyongyang’s imports of crude oil at the level of the last 12 months, and it limits the import of refined petroleum products to two million barrels a year.

The watered-down resolution does not include sanctions the US wanted on North Korea’s national airline and the army.

Nevertheless, US Ambassador Nikki Haley told the council after the vote that “these are by far the strongest measures ever imposed on North Korea”.

But she stressed that “these steps only work if all nations implement them completely and aggressively”.

‘We will never forget the lesson that those who have evil intentions must be confronted’ US Ambassador Nikki Haley said

Ms Haley noted the council was meeting on the 16th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attack. In a clear message to North Korean threats to attack the US, she said: “We will never forget the lesson that those who have evil intentions must be confronted.”

“Today we are saying the world will never accept a nuclear armed North Korea,” she said. “We are done trying to prod the regime to do the right thing” and instead are taking steps to prevent it “from doing the wrong thing”.

She said the US doesn’t take pleasure in strengthening sanctions and reiterated that the US does not want war.

“The North Korean regime has not yet passed the point of no return,” she said.

“If it agrees to stop its nuclear programme it can reclaim its future. If it proves it can live in peace, the world will live in peace with it... If North Korea continues its dangerous path, we will continue with further pressure.”

Britain’s UN ambassador, Matthew Rycroft, told reporters who questioned the watering down of the initial US text “there is a significant prize in keeping the whole of the Security Council united”.

Mr Rycroft called the resolution “a very significant set of additional sanctions”, declaring “we are tightening the screw, and we stand prepared to tighten it further”.

China and Russia had called for a resolution focused on a political solution to the escalating crisis over North Korea’s nuclear programme.

They have proposed a freeze-for-freeze which would halt North Korean nuclear and missile tests in exchange for the US and South Korea stopping their joint military exercises – something the Trump administration has rejected as a false equivalence.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in