An Australian news programme is running a poll asking if women on benefits should be forced to take contraception

A former government minister says young Australian women treat babies like "cash cows" and have children to make money from the welfare system

Siobhan Fenton
Monday 04 January 2016 13:08
Comments
Contraceptive pills
Contraceptive pills

An Australian TV show has sparked outrage after inviting viewers to vote in a poll on whether women on welfare benefits should be forced to take contraception.

A Current Affair, which airs on Network Nine, broadcast a ten minute segment in which a former politician made the case for the measure. Gary Johns, a former government minister and author of the book ‘No Contraception, No Dole’ explained why he thought the policy was a reasonable proposal.

He told viewers that women were treating babies like “cash cows” and manipulating the system in order to have children for money.

He said: “If someone is on an Unemployment Benefit they should be looking for work; not starting a family. If someone’s on a Parenting Payment, perhaps because they’re a single mother, they should be looking after existing children; not having more children. If someone’s on Youth Allowance- they’re a very young woman, they should be studying; not starting a family.”

Mr Johns said that under his proposal, a woman would have an implant coil inserted in order to receive welfare payments, but could have the coil removed once she entered full time work.

He said the step would break the cycle of poverty which sees generations of Australians experience the same low socio-economic conditions inter-generationally.

He says 60,000 births last year in Australia were to women who were in receipt of benefit, amounting to 20 per cent of all births.

Side effects experienced by some women from the implant can include heavy vaginal bleeding and lower abdominal pain.

The programme did not mention if Mr Johns also wished to see men on welfare benefits undergo temporary sterilisation, nor how his logic applied to lesbian women, nor to women who were infertile due to an existing medical condition or old age.

The segment has prompted outcry online with viewers taking to social media to express their shock. One wrote: “Does A Current Affair understand they are actually canvassing a eugenics programme?”

Another said: “Hey A Current Affair- if a question starts with ‘Should women be forced to…’ then it shouldn’t be asked.”

Others suggested alternate questions the programme could ask, including ‘Should poor people be ground up and fed to lions, or composted?’, ‘Should the producers on A Current Affair apply for a brain transplant’?

The Independent has contacted A Current Affair for comment

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in