Australian Broadcasting Corporation admits to 'an error in judgement' after terror suspect is allowed to ask question during TV debate

Zaky Mallah quizzed a junior minister about government plans to strip terrorism suspects with dual nationality of their citizenship

Kathy Marks
Tuesday 23 June 2015 18:48
Comments
In a statement, ABC acknowledged 'an error in judgement in allowing Zaky Mallah to join the audience and ask a question'
In a statement, ABC acknowledged 'an error in judgement in allowing Zaky Mallah to join the audience and ask a question'

Australia’s version of Question Time was in its final minutes when the camera moved to Zaky Mallah, a young man in the audience.

What followed was grist to the mill of those who believe the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) is a hotbed of pinkos, and prompted the Prime Minister Tony Abbott to demand of the national broadcaster: “Whose side are you on?”

Mr Mallah’s question to the Q&A panel was about Mr Abbott’s plans to strip terrorism suspects with dual nationality of their Australian citizenship.

The new laws are aimed primarily at preventing Australians who travel to the Middle East to fight with Isis from returning home.

Yet Mr Mallah was no ordinary member of the public. As Q&A producers knew, the 30-year-old spent two years in prison for threatening to kill security and foreign affairs officials. A jury acquitted him of two terrorism charges relating to alleged threats to mount a suicide attack on government offices in Sydney.

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott branded Q&A 'a lefty lynch mob' (Getty)

Steve Ciobo, a junior minister in Mr Abbott’s conservative government, was incensed. “I’m happy to look you straight in the eye and say that I’d be pleased to be part of the government that would say that you were out of the country,” he told Mr Mallah.

Mr Mallah hit back at Mr Ciobo, calling his comments “rubbish”. He added that many Australian Muslims would feel “justified... to leave and go to Syria and join Isil [Isis] because of ministers like him”.

Amid the furore, Mr Abbott branded Q&A – a favourite target of Australian conservatives – a “lefty lynch mob”. In a statement, the ABC acknowledged “an error in judgement in allowing Zaky Mallah to join the audience and ask a question” – but vowed that Q&A would “continue to raise issues that are provocative and controversial”.

Mr Mallah claimed that he had been trying to make the point that young Muslims felt “vilified” and that “the harder the Abbott government pushes its counter-terrorism agenda, the more radicalised some young people feel”.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in