Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

CASE SUMMARIES : House

Monday 19 December 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

The following notes of judgments were prepared by the reporters of the All England Law Reports.

House Duke of Westminster v Birrane; CA (Nourse, Mann, Saville LJJ); 10 Nov 1994.

For the purposes of s2(2) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, which provided that references in that part of the Act to a "house" did not apply to a house which was not structurally detached and of which a material part lay above or below a part of the structure comprised in the house, the part of the house which lay above or below a part of the structure not comprised in it was a material part of the house if it was of sufficient substance or significance to make it likely that leasehold enfranchisement would prejudice the enjoyment of the house or another part of the structure, whether by reason of the inability of one freehold owner to enforce positive obligations against successors in title of the other, or otherwise.

Robert Reid QC (Boodle Hatfield ) for the appellants; Paul Morgan QC (Jeffrey Green Russell) for the respondent.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in