Charges considered over L'Aquila earthquake
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Seven Italian officials are under investigation for manslaughter for failing to give the citizens of L'Aquila warning before last April's earthquake. The disaster killed more than 300 people and razed the medieval city to the ground.
The investigation was opened when around 30 citizens of the stricken city made an official complaint suggesting the civil protection officials had painted an overly reassuring picture of the earthquake risk after a meeting that took place just six days before the event on 6 April.
In the six months leading up to the earthquake, there had been a series of smaller seismic movements, including a small quake measuring 4.0 on the Richter scale on 30 March, just a day before the experts met in L'Aquila to discuss the risk.
One of the officials present at the 31 March meeting, Franco Barberi, of the Civil Protection agency's commission on major risk, said there was "no reason to suppose a sequence of small earthquakes could be the prelude to strong event".
L'Aquila's public prosecutor Alfredo Rossini said yesterday: "Those responsible are people who should have given different answers to the public. We're not talking about the lack of an alarm, the alarm came with the movements of the ground. We're talking about the lack of advice telling people to leave their homes."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments