El Castillo de Matrera: Spanish castle restoration in Cadiz labelled 'disastrous' by locals amid widespread ridicule

Work prompts comparison to botched attempt to restore 19th century fresco of Jesus Christ

Elsa Vulliamy
Thursday 10 March 2016 12:42
Comments
The 'terrible' restoration of the castle has been criticised
The 'terrible' restoration of the castle has been criticised

The restoration of an ancient Spanish castle has been mocked by locals - as conservationists declared the work a "heritage massacre".

El Castillo de Matrera was built in the ninth century on a hill top in Cadiz, and has been a National Monument since 1949.

After it was badly damaged by rainfall three years ago, architects set about the job of renovating the historic structure.

But Spaniards vented their frustration after photographs of the restored building were released, which showed new materials had been used to stabilise what remained of the original building.

One man told Spain's La Sexta news channel: “They’ve got builders in rather than restorers and, as we say round here, they’ve cocked it up.”

The project has prompted comparisons with the attempt to restore a 19th century Ecce Homo fresco of Jesus Christ by an elderly Christian woman in 2012.

The new castle is being compared to this attempt at restoration by an elderly woman

Hispania Nostra, a Spanish cultural heritage organisation, described the results of the work on the castle as “absolutely terrible”.

A statement on the group's website said: “Foreigners have written to us saying they can’t understand why these follies – better described as heritage massacres – still go on.”

Architect Carlos Quevedo, who oversaw the restoration, defended his project - saying it met the goals that were set ahead of the project.

He also said it was against the law to "imitate" the castle, which explains the stark contrast between the original structure and the newly restored one.

“There were three basic aims,” he told the Guardian.

“To structurally consolidate those elements that were at risk; to differentiate new additions from the original structure – thus avoiding imitative reconstructions that are prohibited by the law; and to recover the volume, texture and tonality that the tower would originally have had."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in