Gabriel Resources gold plans suffer setback, as Romanian parliament rejects mining law

 

The Transylvanian village of Rosia Montana
The Transylvanian village of Rosia Montana

A parliamentary vote in Romania has rejected revisions to a new mining law that would have allowed Gabriel Resources, a Canadian mining company, to create Europe’s largest open cast gold mine in the Transylvanian village of Rosia Montana.

The amendments to the new law were rejected due to inadequate attendance from the part of the deputies with 160 votes for, 22 abstentions and 105 votes against – the required quorum was not met.

Over a planned 16-year extraction period the controversial project was set to reap 314 tonnes of gold and 1,500 tonnes of silver, flatten four mountain tops, and deposit a huge waste lake containing cyanide, a chemical used in the process of gold leaching.

This rejection is one of many setbacks the mining company has faced in a 14-year saga, trying to obtain appropriate permits to start its metals excavation.

In August this year Prime Minster Victor Ponta passed a bill specifically for the proposed project, which triggered fierce international criticism, with protests over the past three months raging from Bucharest, London, New York, and as far-flung as Shanghai.

The mining company claim that job creation would be positive for Rosia Montana, and that the contribution of revenue from the project would be beneficial for the state.

Several hundred protesters congregated before the vote outside parliament chanting “Save Rosia Montana,” demanding lawmakers to vote against the revisions to the country’s mining law.

Eugen David, a local of Rosia Montana and the president of the project’s main opposition group Alburnus Maior, stated: “For over sixteen years we have been telling Gabriel Resources’ shareholders that their mine is illegal and unwanted. Today’s decision confirms this once more and it also confirms the united determination of the Romanian people.”

The main concern of those opposing the project point to possible environmental damage, often citing a cyanide spill in the northern city of Baia Mare - where a dam cracked in 2000 - which spewed 100,000 cubic metres of water contaminated with cyanide into 2000km of River Danube tributaries, polluting waters in Hungary, Serbia, and the Black Sea.

The Baia Mare disaster is said to be the worst environmental disaster in Europe since the Chernobyl catastrophe in 1986.

Earlier this week, fifty Greenpeace activists from 10 countries – in protest against the mine - were arrested in Bucharest for taking to the lawn of People’s Palace, the second largest building in the world that hosts the Romanian government, for digging the lawn ‘for gold’ with pick axes.

Gabriel Resources have so far spent more than $500m on the project, and the company is yet to release a statement on this latest setback.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in