Al-Qaeda video shows public execution of woman accused of adultery

The militant groups continue to disagree, despite joining in praise of Paris shootings

The shocking video shows a woman being executed after al-Qaeda militants claim she committed adultery
The shocking video shows a woman being executed after al-Qaeda militants claim she committed adultery

A video has emerged online that appears to show the execution of a woman accused by al-Qaeda of committing adultery.

The footage was obtained by the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which claimed it showed such ritualistic and barbaric executions were not limited to the Isis militant group.

Rami Abdulrahman, the monitoring group’s director, said the video had been filmed on a mobile phone by a member of the al-Qaeda affiliate Nusra Front.

It shows the woman initially protesting a large group of heavily-armed men standing in a square identified by the Observatory as being in the city of Idlib, up to 80 per cent of which lies under Nusra Front control.

The video starts with a wide shot showing a square full of heavily-armed jihadists

The men can be seen ordering the woman, whose arms appear to be bound behind her back, to kneel. A man wearing a full-length black tunic then issues a speech reportedly declaring the woman has been convicted by an Islamic court of adultery, after which she is shot in the head by a militant in body armour.

The video has proved controversial among jihadis themselves, according to reports in the Mail.

The al-Qaeda affiliate Nusra Front is reported to control around 80 per cent of the city of Idlib, where the execution is believed to take place

Isis and al-Qaeda have repeatedly clashed in recent months on ideological points regarding their differing interpretations of Islam, and one supporter of the so-called Islamic State, known as Abu Hammad, wrote: “Jabhat al-Nusra kills a woman by shooting for adultery. Which Shariah is that???”

Though experts have said that relations between al-Qaeda and Isis had “never been worse” in the buildup to last week’s shootings in Paris, evidence continues to emerge of a blurring of the boundaries between the two.

Al-Qaeda militants force the woman to get to her knees, after which a man in body armour shoots her in the head

On Wednesday, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) released a media statement claiming responsibility for the attack on the Charlie Hebdo offices that left 12 people dead – but also praised a supermarket siege in which Isis supporter Amedy Coulibaly killed four Jewish men.

Less than 24 hours later, Isis’s official media wing issued a video in which three French-speaking jihadists praised the attacks as a whole, making no distinction between those supposedly carried out in the names of AQAP and Isis respectively.

Though the latest al-Qaeda video to emerge appeared genuine, it could not immediately be independently verified.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in