Syria news: Russia claims majority of missiles were intercepted during overnight air strikes

Military officials in Moscow say Soviet-era defence system shot down 71 of 103 rockets used in attack

Air strikes launched in Syria after chemical weapon attack

Russia has claimed the majority of missiles fired overnight in a joint air strike on Syria by US, British and French forces were intercepted - despite the Western countries' hailing of the operation as a success.

Moscow said on Saturday the Syrian government had been able to shoot down 71 of the 103 Cruise missiles used in the attack with their Soviet-era air defence systems.

The weapons were launched from ships and manned aircraft in a targeted attack on Syria’s main chemical weapons facilities, according to the US defence ministry.

However, allied forces have disputed the Russian account of events, with France saying there was no indication any of the 12 missiles its military fired during the attack were intercepted.

Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday morning the air strike had been "a highly successful mission", while US Marine Corps General Joe Dunford said targets identified by the three nations had been "struck and destroyed".

However, Russia’s ministry of defence claims none of the rockets launched entered areas where Russian air defence equipment was protecting military facilities in Tartus and Hmeimim.

Colonel General Sergei Rudskoi, of the Russian military's general staff, said the attack had not caused any casualties and Syrian military installations had only suffered “minor damage”.

Col Rudskoi said Syrian forces used ground-to-air missile defence systems with “high efficiency”, shooting down all of the rockets aimed at four key Syrian air bases.

He added that Russia had refrained in the past from providing Syria with its state-of-the-art S-300 air defence missile systems, but could reconsider its decision following the strike.

Russia’s claims a defence system designed in the 1950s had taken down allied missiles could be interpreted as a swipe at President Donald Trump, who had boasted on Twitter Russia would be unable to down "nice, new and smart" US weapons.

Russian president Vladimir Putin has condemned the strike, launched in response to a suspected poison gas attack that killed dozens of people in Douma last week, as an "act of aggression" that will exacerbate humanitarian catastrophe in the war-torn nation.

In a statement issued by the Kremlin, the Russian leader said Moscow would be calling an emergency meeting of the United Nations' Security Council over the attack.

Mr Putin added that the strike had a "destructive influence on the entire system of international relations."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in