1995 Conspiracy: The 'loud bang' plot that employed the same tactics

Jerome Taylor
Friday 11 August 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

The latest details emerging from yesterday's foiled terrorist plot bear a remarkable resemblance to one of the most daring attempts by Islamic-inspired terrorists to launch a series of devastating attacks against Western airline targets.

In January 1995, police in the Philippines capital, Manila, investigated a fire in a flat rented by three men. Initially they said it was "just some Pakistanis playing with firecrackers" but they had uncovered one of the most audacious terror plots to date: a bid to smuggle liquid explosives on to 12 American airliners and detonate them simultaneously in mid-flight.

The mastermind was Ramzi Yousef, now serving a life sentence in the US for a bid to blow up the World Trade Centre in 1993.

With his fellow conspirators Abdul Hakim Murad and Wali Khan Amin Shah, Yousef had hatched a plan to smuggle liquid nitroglycerin, hidden in contact lens solution bottles, on to airliners. Nitroglycerin, Murad boasted after his arrest, was almost impossible to detect.

Using a modified Casio watch as a timer, two 9v batteries and a detonator hidden in their shoes, the idea was to assemble the bomb on the first leg of a flight, then disembark at the stopover. The explosives would detonate once the planes were back in the air.

The plot, codenamed "Bojinka" after the Serbo-Croat for "loud bang", was abandoned after the fire. But two months earlier Yousef had tested it, leaving a device on a Philippines Airlines flight to Tokyo which killed a Japanese businessman and wounded dozens. The plane survived and the pilot made an emergency landing.

Yousef's globalised approach to terrorism and desire to carry out momentous attacks was regarded as a precursor to the 9/11 attacks. Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the Pakistani-Kuwaiti who masterminded the operation, reportedly decided after "Bojinka" that smuggling explosives on to planes was too risky and that turning hijacked planes into flying bombs was a safer option for catastrophic attacks.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in