Western Australia is home to some of the country’s finest beaches. But in recent times it has acquired a rather less enviable reputation – as the world’s shark attack capital.
After a surfer, Chris Boyd, was killed last month, in the sixth fatal attack in two years, the state government decided enough was enough. Normally unflappable locals were thinking twice before taking their daily plunge. And then there was the tourist trade to think of.
This week, it announced that 72 baited hooks, to be laid a kilometre off popular beaches, will be used to catch sharks. Great whites, tiger sharks and bull sharks – the species most dangerous to humans – will now be shot if they are larger than 3 metres (10ft), and their bodies dumped at sea.
It was not a cull, insisted the Fisheries Minister, Troy Buswell, perhaps mindful of the endangered Great White’s protected status. Rather, he said, it was “a targeted, localised shark mitigation strategy”. Semantics aside, conservationists are horrified. They say the strategy is not only inhumane but ineffective. It has already been attempted in Queensland, as well South Africa, Hawaii and Brazil, where it has been found to have no effect on the rate of attacks.
A shark biologist at the University of Western Sydney, Ryan Kempster, says the same result could be achieved “by simply moving sharks alive offshore, instead of killing them and then dumping their bodies offshore”.
That, however, a cynic might say, would not reap as much political capital.
Register for free to continue reading
Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism
By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists
Already have an account? sign in
Join our new commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies