Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

There are only two truly intact forests left on Earth, study claims

Roads have carved up the wilderness

Christopher Hooton
Tuesday 24 March 2015 12:21 GMT
Comments
(Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Can a forest be considered a forest if it is carved up by roads and highways? No, say a team of researchers who studied forest fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems.

"There are really only two big patches of intact forest left on Earth, the Amazon and the Congo, and they shine out like eyes from the centre of the map," lead author Nick Haddad, a professor at North Carolina State University, told the New Yorker.

The "persistent, deleterious and often unpredicted" effects of human settlement were laid bare by the study, funded by the National Science Foundation, which saw 24 scientists from around the world examine the results of seven experiments that took place on five continents.

Though forests may be protected from extensive development, wide roads snaking through them can be damaging enough.

The tropical rainforest in the Congo is considered one of the last 'two big patches' of forest (Picture: Getty)
The tropical rainforest in the Congo is considered one of the last 'two big patches' of forest (Picture: Getty)

"Nearly 20 percent of the world's remaining forests are the distance of a football field, or about 100 metres, away from forest edges," Haddad elaborated. "Seventy percent of forest lands are within a half-mile of forest edges. That means almost no forests can really be considered wilderness."

The study focused specifically on the effects of this on wildlife and the results were pretty shocking.

Plant and animal diversity can be reduced by anywhere from 13 to 75 percent in fragmented habits, with birds, mammals, insects and plants all being affected. The food chain can be skewed too, with forests with more edges being a coup for predators but bad news or those they prey on.

Another problem is that the effects of forest fragmentation may only become apparent years later, and get worse over time.

"The effects of current fragmentation will continue to emerge for decades," the study claims. "We still haven’t seen the full extent of what our slicing and dicing of the forests has wrought."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in