US military awards contracts for nuclear spacecraft propulsion

The Pentagon awarded deals to companies with a mix of tested and radical designs

Jon Kelvey
Thursday 19 May 2022 23:58
Comments
<p>Nasa concept art of a nuclear propulsion spacecraft</p>

Nasa concept art of a nuclear propulsion spacecraft

The US military has awarded two contracts for the development of nuclear space propulsion, with a goal to see orbital prototypes fly by 2027.

The Defense Innovation Unit of the Pentagon, which works to apply commercial technologies to military problems, awarded the contracts to Avalanche Energy and Ultra Safe Nuclear, both of Seattle Washington.

They will provide “solutions that give small spacecraft the ability to maneuver at-will in cis-lunar space and enable high-power payloads that will support the expansion of Department of Defense (DoD) space missions,” according to a statement. The term “cis-lunar” refers to the space between Earth and the Moon and the Moon’s orbit.

“Advanced nuclear technologies will provide the speed, power, and responsiveness to maintain an operational advantage in space,” US Air Force Maj Ryan Weed, the program manager for the Pentagon’s Nuclear Advanced Propulsion and Power, said in the statement.

“Nuclear tech has traditionally been government-developed and operated, but we have discovered a thriving ecosystem of commercial companies, including start-ups, innovating in space nuclear."

Ultra Safe Nuclear is researching a next generation form of radioisotope battery, which uses the decay of radioactive isotopes, such as americium-241 , or plutonium-238, to generate electricity.

Similar technologies have provided the electricity for Nasa missions into deep space, such as the Voyager, Cassini, and New Horizons spacecraft. The statement says Ultra Safe Nuclear’s technology could yield 10 times the power of existing radioisotope systems.

Avalanche energy, meanwhile, is developing a compact fusion reactor it calls the Orbitron.

Fusion is the same thermonuclear reaction that takes place in the Sun, where hydrogen atoms are squeezed together under tremendous pressure to form helium atoms. This releases more energy than nuclear fission, a chain reaction splitting the large atoms of heavy elements such as uranium, and which powers existing nuclear power plants on Earth.

The Avalanche Energy notes on its website that most fusion reactor research has so far relied on massive machinery and that no designs to date have produced more energy than they consume.

If successful with their prototype, either the Avalanche Energy Orbitron or Ultra Safe Nuclear radioisotope battery could power a nuclear electric spacecraft. Such a spacecraft would use thruster technology similar to existing satellites, where electricity is used to accelerate charged propellant particles out of the thruster to generate thrust.

Thrusters generate lower thrust very efficiently, and so can allow a spacecraft to build to very high velocities over time while using much less propellant than chemical rockets.

Using nuclear rather than solar or other power sources can allow thrusters to operate more efficiently, for longer, and in the absence of abundant sunlight.

The Orbitron could also serve as the basis of a nuclear thermal spacecraft. Instead of just generating electricity, the nuclear reactor of such a spacecraft generates thrust by heating a liquid propellant, such as liquid hydrogen, which then exits the engine, producing the same high thrust, but twice as efficiently, as chemical rockets.

“Chemical and solar-based systems won’t provide the power needed for future DoD missions,” Maj Weed said in a statement.

It’s not just the US military that’s interested in nuclear propulsion systems. In 2021, Nasa, in partnership with the US Department of Energy, awarded contracts to several companies — including Ultra Safe Nuclear Technologies — to research nuclear propulsion technologies.

With plans to send humans to Mars in the 2040s, Nasa is interested in finding ways to cut down the travel time for Mars astronauts, and nuclear propulsion could cut a three year round trip mission down to close to two years.

“We’re exploring both nuclear electric and nuclear thermal propulsion options for crewed Mars missions,” Nasa’s nuclear technology portfolio lead in the space technology directorate Anthony Calomino said in a statement. “Each technology has its unique advantages and challenges that need to be carefully considered when determining the final preference.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in