Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Olympic Stadium: Q & A

Martyn Ziegler
Tuesday 11 October 2011 15:31 BST
Comments
West Ham had been in line to take over the stadium after the Olympics
West Ham had been in line to take over the stadium after the Olympics (GETTY IMAGES)

Q: What has happened to the Olympic Stadium?

A: The deal to sell the stadium to West Ham and Newham Council after the 2012 Games has collapsed due to legal challenges by Tottenham and Leyton Orient.

Q: What will happen now?

A: The stadium will remain in public ownership, for the short to medium term at least, and will be rented out to a tenant. Bids to be that tenant have to be made by January.

Q: Who is that tenant likely to be?

A: West Ham again, as was admitted by London mayor Boris Johnson - especially as Tottenham have announced they are staying near White Hart Lane. Leyton Orient have also said they will bid to be a tenant.

Q: What about the running track that has caused all the problems?

A: Olympics minister Hugh Robertson says that is "non-negotiable" and that it will be kept, ensuring that London's bid for the 2017 world athletics championships is not compromised.

Q: Will the taxpayer be called upon to help cover the cost of the rent?

A: The Government and Johnson say not - that the rent will cover the running costs and that there will be a benefit to the taxpayer.

Q: What about the cost of changing the stadium after the London 2012 Olympics?

A: There is £35million already in the Olympic budget, and Robertson stated that Newham Council may be prepared to commit £40million, leaving a funding gap of £20million. That may have to be covered by the Olympic Park Legacy Company and recouped from future rental income.

Q: Can the stadium be sold to the tenants in the future?

A: That may well be possible.

Q: How did the Olympic Stadium plans end up in this mess?

A: When the plans for the stadium were first drawn up no-one grasped the nettle and admitted there would be problems covering the cost of running the stadium after the Games unless a football club was involved. A proper solution would have been retractable seating to cover the running track when needed - but that was never seriously considered.

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in