Premier League insists VAR is ‘here to stay’ – but concedes changes may be needed over offside rule

The idea of getting rid of the controversial system has been totally ruled out, but there is an acceptance some tweaks are necessary

Miguel Delaney
Chief Football Writer
Tuesday 04 February 2020 18:41 GMT
Comments
VAR Explained: How will video refereeing work in the Premier League?

The Premier League has insisted VAR is “here to stay” – but that it will look at the implementation of the offside rule and whether “a bit of tolerance” needs to be built in.

The idea of getting rid of the controversial system has been totally ruled out, but there is an acceptance some tweaks are necessary.

Speaking at a press conference to announce his appointment as chief executive, new Premier League boss Richard Masters said there will be a “bigger conversation” with the clubs in April to discuss how they want it to work going forward.

The Premier League has also conducted its own supporter poll on the issue that will be released on Thursday, although it is understood to be along the lines of Tuesday’s YouGov poll which revealed 67% of fans think VAR has made football less enjoyable – but that 74% want to keep it, albeit with tweaks.

Masters said the Premier League is satisfied correct decisions are having an outcome on games and on the league tables.

“I think it’s here to stay and certainly it’s going to be with us next season,” Masters insisted, before admitting there may be changes to how it handles offsides, within Ifab protocols. “I think offsides is one and whether you want offsides that are precise to the armpit or the heel, or whether you want to build in a bit of tolerance. That is sort of a technical challenge.

“We are in constant dialogue with Ifab about it – and about the way the Premier League does it versus everyone else and what we can learn from other leagues.”

Masters admitted that supporter experience needs to be improved, especially in relation to fans being able to watch contentious calls as they are being reviewed, or the “psychological” impact of knowing the referee is watching an incident himself.

“We wanted to make sure it came in and delivered the benefits but to minimum disruption. You have got fans in the stadium watching something, the use of the review area is another debate. We have recently expanded the remit on that to cover red cards and downgrades from red card situations. I think if fans can see the referee using the referee review area then psychologically they are seeing something happening rather than waiting for Stockley Park to make a decision. That will be a discussion point. We always intended to use it – sparingly.”

“We will look at the development next season to iron out some of the issues we have had. We are doing that. We have improved the in-stadium communication with the slightly different replay screen experience we now have and I think the decision making is now better. If we can get that speed up as well, and it will happen in time… everybody is on a learning curve.”

Masters admitted that the Premier League wants to make some changes that are impossible due to Ifab protocols. The rule-setting body will meet in Belfast on Saturday 29 February.

“Some of the things we want to do are outside of the extremities of the Ifab protocol. We would probably want to show a bit more of the action live on screen, but we are not allowed to do that.

“I think we are the only European league that shows clips in an overturn situation. We are also the only league that shows the cross-hairs, the measurement of offside. Despite Uefa using exactly the same system, they just show the line once the cross-hairs have been delivered. Again, we will look at whether that is a net positive or has an impact on the watching viewer at home.

“We have done our own poll. I think it broadly says what you’d expect it to say – the bit about improving decision-making people like, the majority of football fans actually want VAR to be a success and wanted it to come in. There is obviously the other part of VAR which is consistent decision-making, the time to take decision-making, frustration perhaps with the precision offsides and whether you like that or don’t, the jury is out on that.

“By the way, the decision-making part has improved I think we are at 94 percent key match decisions are correct now, 97 percent of assistants decisions are correct, so it is having an impact on the outcome of games, on the league tables, which is what you wanted to happen and as a league we want to work really hard on ironing out those other issues and that is what we are discussing with clubs. So when we get to April there will be a bigger conversation about what sort of VAR clubs want to have in the Premier League next season.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in