Labour demand Super League answers from Boris Johnson after meeting with Manchester United

Plans for the Super League quickly disintegrated after the weekend amid uproar from fans

Miguel Delaney
Chief Football Writer
Sunday 25 April 2021 22:30
Comments
<p>Boris Johnson is alleged to have discussed the Super League with Man United executives</p>

Boris Johnson is alleged to have discussed the Super League with Man United executives

Labour have demanded Prime Minister Boris Johnson clarify exactly what was “promised to Manchester United about a European Super League”, in a second letter from Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport Jo Stevens to Cabinet Secretary Simon Case regarding the issue.

“If Boris Johnson gave the European Super League his backing and then publicly turned on the plan then the British people deserve a full, clear and immediate explanation and apology,” the letter reads.

The Independent first broke the news of the 14 April meeting between United’s outgoing executive vice-chairman Ed Woodward, Prime Minister Johnson and chief of staff Dan Rosenfield, with both the club and Number 10 insistent that only Covid passports and the return of fans was discussed. The Sunday Times has subsequently reported that the Super League was discussed, and that sources say the government “appeared to offer support” for the controversial idea.

“Sources claim Rosenfield’s conversation with Woodward emboldened the English clubs to back the scheme, heralding the biggest crisis in the game for decades,” the report reads. “Sources accept that Woodward may have briefly met Johnson and left with the wrong impression that he was in favour of the proposal.”

United say that their stance is unchanged, and the Super League was not discussed.

Government sources maintain the same line, that there were no talks around the plan, and that the meeting concerned the return of fans to stadiums.

Stevens’ letter demands clarity, and includes another call for the minutes and any correspondence to be published, as well as a list of questions to be answered.

“1. When was the meeting with Ed Woodward that took place on 14 April 2021 arranged?

2. In what capacity was Ed Woodward attending the meeting?

3. Who else was present at the meeting?

5. Will you publish any correspondence relating to the meeting?

6. Was anyone from the Department of Digital Culture Media and Sport present at the meeting?

7. What meetings have taken place between a) The Prime Minister and his officials b) DCMS ministers and officials, and representatives of Liverpool, Tottenham Hotspur, Arsenal, Chelsea and Manchester City Football clubs?

8. Please publish any correspondence relating to these meetings

9. What discussions took place at any meetings?”

The other Premier League clubs previously told The Independent they had no knowledge of the meeting.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in