Fiszman will back Wenger search for a 'big talent'

Sam Wallace
Tuesday 27 May 2008 00:00
Comments

Arsenal's largest shareholder - and the man who holds the balance of power at the club - said yesterday that Arsene Wenger would be given all the resources he asked for this in this summer's transfer market. Danny Fiszman said, however, that it would be a "big talent" rather than a "big name" that his club sought in the transfer market.

Fiszman, who owns 24.11 per cent of Arsenal, said that the club had "never said no" to Wenger and "have no intention of saying no to him [now]". The club have already identified the Marseille midfielder Samir Nasri as a target and he could cost as much as pnds11m but it does not appears that they will be in the hunt for any of the biggest earners in European football.

Fiszman is a crucial figure in orchestrating the current five-year lockdown agreement among the Arsenal board that prevents any of them selling shares to facilitate a potential takeover - chief among them the Uzbek billionaire Alisher Usmanov whose acquisition of shares has stalled on 23 per cent. Fiszman said: "Whoever he [Wenger] wishes to bring in, he will be fully supported. There is no set amount. I think it is about big talents and committed players."

The departure of Mathieu Flamini on a free transfer to Milan this month was not, Fiszman claimed, a result of the club failing to compete with the top wages. "We made a substantial offer to Mathieu, it was considerable and in line with our wage structure but he chose to go elsewhere," he said. "We wish him luck. You say 'We don't pay the wages that other teams do'. If you look at our total wage costs you will see they are virtually the same as Manchester United and substantially more than Liverpool.

"Of course we are all a little less than Chelsea who are in a world of their own. But compared to United and Liverpool we are good payers. We believe it is a team sport and we do well but we don't want the disparity between the top and bottom earner being too big. It takes 11 people on the pitch to deliver."

Fiszman did not go into detail over the sacking of managing director Keith Edelman but he did say that there would not be a new "director of football" to take over from David Dein who was forced out in April last year. He also brushed off the need for a new investor such as Usmanov, who bought Dein's shares, to move the club on.

Fiszman said: "We don't believe in the benefactor model. It is not a question of a one-time infusion of cash to buy a player. You actually then have salaries that are connected to the players. What if they don't work out? Do you go and buy another two or three players? Is there any end to it? So I think everybody, including Chelsea, knows there are limits."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in