We might be wrong about how Mars was made, scientists say

The planet may have formed over a much longer time than we'd thought, researchers say – and in much more violent circumstances

Scientists say we might be wrong about how Mars was made

We might be wrong about how Mars formed, scientists have said.

The Red Planet may have taken much longer to form, and done so in an unexpectedly violent way, according to new research.

It is hard to know how Mars formed, and how much that was dictated by collisions in the early solar system, because the surface has been wiped of evidence over the billions of year that have come between.

But by studying rock on Earth that made its way here from Mars, researchers think they have pulled together some of the story of the distant planet's early history..

It suggests that the planet might have formed over a longer time than previously thought, and been bombarded with small protoplanets as its early history was taking shape.

Researchers have previously looked at elements found in meteorites that came down from Mars and concluded that Mars would have grown rapidly after the first 2-4 million years of the Solar System's existence. But the new study suggests that it would have been smashed with collisions during that earlier history, and the formation might have taken as long as 20 million years.

Some 61,000 meteorites have been found on Earth, and about 200 of them are thought to have come here Mars. Those that have been discovered were probably thrown off Mars during collisions in its more recent history.

Looking through those rocks, scientists found elements such as tungsten and platinum, which tend to cling to iron. Such elements tend to find their way from the mantle towards the edges of the planet and into the core at its centre as the planet forms.

The discovery of those elements in the rock suggests that Mars was hit by what scientists call planetesimals – small objects not big enough to be planets – after its core had been created.

Researchers can look at the isotopes of those particular elements and understand at what time planet formation happened.

"We knew Mars received elements such as platinum and gold from early, large collisions. To investigate this process, we performed smoothed-particle hydrodynamics impact simulations," said Dr. Simone Marchi, lead author of the new paper, from the Southwest Research Institute.

"Based on our model, early collisions produce a heterogeneous, marble-cake-like Martian mantle. These results suggest that the prevailing view of Mars formation may be biased by the limited number of meteorites available for study."

The pieces of Mars that came down to Earth probably came from a relatively limited number of places on the Red Planet. Researchers now hope that future Mars missions can pick up pieces of the planet and bring them back down to Earth, giving a better understanding of the makeup of elements in Martian rocks and more detail on how the planet formed.

"To fully understand Mars, we need to understand the role the earliest and most energetic collisions played in its evolution and composition," Marchi concluded.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in