Tanaiste: Fake ads about me originated in Russia
Micheal Martin said X is ‘far less’ co-operative than Google on online defamation.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Stolen credit cards were used to finance fake ads about Micheal Martin which originated in Russia and Belarus, the Tanaiste has said.
Mr Martin made the claims as the Government published its Defamation (Amendment) Bill on Thursday.
The Bill includes measures to “make it easier and less costly to tackle online defamation”.
He said: “I’ve been subjected to such online advertisements and fake ads and so on and it strikes me as extraordinarily challenging for individual citizens to seek the identity of such online defamers.”
The High Court previously issued a court order to force Google to hand over information about ads which suggested that Mr Martin was endorsing cryptocurrency companies, after the Fianna Fail leader took legal action against the multinational on the matter.
There seems to be a model of revenue generation here that's unacceptable in terms of the proper application of the rule of law
Mr Martin said: “The fake ads seem to have originated from jurisdictions in Belarus and Russia.
“It seems that stolen credit cards were used to pay for the ads.
“Notwithstanding the fact that we’ve received a High Court order, I’ve written again to Google in respect of the ads that appeared on Google to get further clarity on the steps it intends to take because there seems to be a model of revenue generation here that’s unacceptable in terms of the proper application of the rule of law.”
Even with the court order, Mr Martin said forensic specialists had “great difficulty” going through the “enormous” amount of documentation from Google on the matter.
Asked if his criticism of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was a factor in being targeted, Mr Martin said he did not know and could not make a definitive comment on the matter.
“We’ve had far less co-operation from X (formerly Twitter), who had a whole series of fake ads in respect of my good self and others in the midst of the local elections and advance of the referenda.”
Mr Martin said he welcomes the legislation addressing what he deems to be a “serious issue”.
He further warned that fake ads could undermine democracy in the middle of election campaigns.
Google declined to comment and X did not respond to a query on the matter.