The Independent’s journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.

The Snappening: Thousands of photos and videos released through third party Snapchat app

Latest photographic leak could be classed as child pornography thanks to Snapchat's predominantly young userbase

Rose Troup Buchanan
Tuesday 14 October 2014 08:33
Comments
An application security expert says it scrutinises Snapchat's claim that its servers 'were never breached'
An application security expert says it scrutinises Snapchat's claim that its servers 'were never breached'

Tens of thousands of Snapchat images and videos taken by ordinary teenagers have been released online after being stored by a third party website.

Tens of thousands of Snapchat images and videos taken by ordinary teenagers have been released online after being stored by a third party website.

Despite suggestions the leak, dubbed ‘The Snappening’, might be a hoax The Daily Beast confirmed the photographs had been leaked online via viralpop.com, with the file containing the material downloaded thousands of times before the bogus website was deleted.

Snapchat claims around 50 per cent of its users are between 13 and 17 years old, meaning this latest leak potentially includes images which classed as child pornography.

It is estimated approximately 90,000 photographs and 9,000 videos were leaked through a third-party app, with many of the images originating from Europeans who account for 32 per cent of Snapchat’s customers.

Snapsave representative Georgie Casey said to Engadget: “Our app had nothing to do with it and we've never logged username/passwords.” He also said Snapsave doesn't run on a cloud setup.

Similarly named website Snapsaved is another possible source of the leak. Over the weekend the website – which mimicked the original app and allowed users to save images permanently – issued a statement: “I would like to inform the public that snapsaved.com was hacked, the dictionary index the poster is referring to, was never publicly available.”

Unlike the celebrity nude photograph leak, which saw a slew of prominent female stars’ intimate pictures released online via 4chan, The Snappening images appear to be equally mixed.

It is suspected those responsible for the hacking the celebrities may have also had a hand in this latest photograph leak, as both leaks began in discussion on a 4chan discussion forum with users warned on Friday that the photos would be leaked.

A Reddit user over the weekend claimed to have downloaded the leaked files, writing: “The Snapping is 13GB of low resolution garbage.”

Snapchat has continuously denied responsibility for the leak, issuing a statement claiming: "We can confirm that Snapchat’s servers were never breached and were not the source of these leaks.

"Snapchatters were victimized by their use of third-party apps to send and receive Snaps, a practice that we expressly prohibit in our Terms of Use."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in