TikTok reportedly told moderators to 'suppress' content from 'ugly, poor, obese and disabled users’

App moderators punished users by 'artificially narrowing their audiences' 

Chelsea Ritschel
Wednesday 18 March 2020 16:28
Comments
TikTok suppressed content from 'ugly, poor, disabled users' (Stock)
TikTok suppressed content from 'ugly, poor, disabled users' (Stock)

Video-sharing app TikTok reportedly instructed its moderators to “suppress posts created by users deemed too ugly, poor or disabled for the platform,” according to leaked documents viewed by The Intercept.

In the documents, it details how moderators were instructed to choose which videos show up on the app’s “For You” feed.

According to the report, moderators were told to avoid choosing videos that showed users with “abnormal body shape (not limited to: dwarf, acromegaly),” who are “chubby … obese or too thin,” or “ugly facial looks or facial deformities” because the videos would not do as well.

“If the character’s appearance is not good, the video will be much less attractive, not worthing [sic] to be recommended to new users,” the documents read.

Videos that showed “dilapidated” backgrounds were also removed, according to the report, because of their “less appealing” environment, as was content that showed “rural poverty, slums, beer bellies and crooked smiles” - with moderators “effectively punishing” these users by “artificially narrowing their audiences”.

The Chinese social media platform’s moderators were also reportedly told to censor political speech and “punish” those who disobeyed the rules with bans from the app.

The platform has since denied that the guidelines for TikTok, whose "mission is to capture and present the world's creativity, knowledge, and precious life moments,” according to its website, are still in place.

According to a spokesperson for the app, which sees 800m monthly users, “most” of the guidelines are out of date or were never formally in use.

“Most of” these guidelines “are either no longer in use, or in some cases appear to never have been in place,” TikTok spokesperson Josh Gartner told The Intercept.

Gartner also said that the rules regarding videos with unattractive, disabled or poor users “represented an early blunt attempt at preventing bullying, but are no longer in place, and were already out of use when the Intercept obtained them”.

According to The Intercept’s report, sources indicate that “both sets of policies were in use through at least late 2019”.

The Independent has contacted TikTok for comment.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in