Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The UK just claimed its Middle East ties are ‘stronger than ever’. Here’s what it means for human rights

When any military buys our weapons or signs a military deal, it knows that it is also buying silence, writes Andrew Smith

Sunday 25 October 2020 14:29 GMT
Comments
Amnesty International activists march with homemade replica missiles during a protest over UK arms sales to Saudi Arabia, 18 March 2016
Amnesty International activists march with homemade replica missiles during a protest over UK arms sales to Saudi Arabia, 18 March 2016 (Getty)

Our strongest ever UK-Gulf ties.” This is how James Cleverly, the UK’s Middle East minister, enthusiastically summarised his recent visit to Qatar and Oman. It was a busy trip. While there, he was greeted by royalty, welcomed at trade shows, and rubbed shoulders with high-level dignitaries across both kingdoms. The visit was his first to either country since assuming the role, but it follows years of increased diplomacy and focus.

As people across the region are all too aware, the UK has never left the Middle East. But that didn’t stop Philip Hammond, then foreign secretary, from paternalistically proclaiming that “we and our European partners will be expected to take a greater share of the burden in the Gulf, the Near East and North Africa” as part of a 2014 “pivot” in UK military policy. Cleverly’s visit was the most recent step in the “return” strategy that Hammond had alluded to.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in